Rumours & Allegations:

My Response

Context & Clarifications

There has been several claims spread about me online that have been exaggerated, lack crucial context or completely fabricated. Therefore this site will contain all links, sources and relevant information to debunk certain claims and to provide the full context in a digestible format.
A Google Document is linked comprehensively covering all my controversial situations in depth.
A Google Drive has also been linked that provides screenshots and evidence in regards to certain allegations.I have taken an extensive break to reconsider my past actions and I will not be returning to content creation or the drama space. I wish to just clear the false accusations, show people that I am taking active steps to change as a person, recorrect my course in life and simply just move on from this all.

For clarification, segments in this page have been written in both first and third person interchangeably.

False Predator Allegations

Dupe / Catfish Situation

Any claims spread that I am a predator or groomer are completely baseless and categorically untrue.
These claims mainly stemmed due to a situation that took place from 2023-2025, where I had dated someone online named Dupe [Melting] who claimed to be 17 when I was 19 in 2024 [AOC in UK is 16]. There was a believed 1 year 11 month age gap. He claimed to be born on April 10th 2007, I was born on May 2nd 2005.

Dupe throughout April 2024 to March 2025, would consistently lie claiming that they were 17 to Parlo and that they were born on April 10th 2007.

Dupe lied about being 16 throughout 2023 to April 2024.
It was revealed in 2025 that they had lied about their age for years, lied about going to college, having a job and used fake personal information [they were actually 12]. 
GOOGLE DRIVE LINK CONTAINING EVIDENCE.
A user named NatzPop who has serious accusations against himself, made a false police report in regards to the situation that led to my arrest on September 11th 2025.A statement from the Detective Constable, part of the UK Online Child Protection Investigation Team, who investigated the Dupe situation and chat logs, stated on 23rd May 2026, that; ‘the investigation has concluded and due to a lack of evidence found, no further action will be taken’. 

The Detective Constable has an official UK police email, meaning that this is authentic. 

Parlo’s Solicitor on March 6th sent an email stating that Parlo would not face charges in court, the bail conditions would be lifted and No Further Action would be taken.

This has been corroborated with an Official ACRO Police National Computer Report in which shows I was NOT CHARGED. No crimes were committed.

Dupe [Melting] has also come out on his own volition on Twitter to attest that I am not a predator nor did I groom them [1].

Dupe [Melting] is further seen stating once again that any accusation towards me that I am  a ‘groomer’ is incredibly disingenuous due to the lack of fundamental context behind the situation and for the fact that it does not fit the criteria of grooming. 

Dupe is also seen stating that his May 26th 2025 apology to me was NOT coerced, despite malicious individuals attempting to lie and claim it as such with no evidence.

Full May 26th 2025 statement from Dupe, apologising to me and offering more clarity regarding the entire situation.

Dupe confirmed that I never sent them NSFW content, never groomed or manipulated them, never leveraged my influence to coerce him and never pushed their boundaries. 

Dupe also states that he disagrees with the claims made in 77’s defamatory document as it is ‘bullshit’. This document omitted context, lied about other allegations, and manipulated / reframed the Dupe situation to make me seem insidious and predatory. The document was also formatted by ChatGPT and bloated to 100 pages to make it seem more reliable.

77 and his associates had also attempted to dox me, and call CPS on my address in an attempt to intimidate, pressure and harass me. Dupe was the one who suggested for them to cease the malicious behaviour.

Dupe states how the examples of where we continuously changed and switched our ages were edgy, cringe and poorly aged recurring jokes. These were not legitimate admissions of age. I did not know he was 13.

These were a few examples present in the chat messages of me and Dupe joking about our ages and consistently changing them to play into a recurring bit. They were not genuine admissions. I have also further apologised for the grooming jokes, that were completely out of place, immature and embarrassing looking back. While they were made with no ill intent, they aged poorly and should not have been sent by a Roblox YouTuber with a large following and platform like I had at the time.
Many people had also attempted to reference a message I had sent to Dupe referencing a completely different user. When I had stated that ‘he knew they were 13’, malicious individuals attempted to completely obfuscate the context of the message and make it appear as if I was referencing the fact that I somehow knew Dupe was 13, which was NOT the case.
For context, Dupe created excuses for why they could not call in voice chat or send selfies to further verify their identity. Since this situation I have always taken proactive measures to ID verify people I message online. I was extremely irresponsible, but it is bad faith to retroactively claim this is pedophilia or grooming, when that requires knowledge of the maturity dynamic present and intent.

Schlep has publicly come out to state that I was NOT a predator or pedophile especially in regards to this situation. Schlep highlights how Dupe lied about their age and that explicit images were not even shared.

Schlep also states that legally no crime was committed and using term pedophilia in regards to this situation is illogical as it does not fit the criteria.

[https://x.com/RealSchlep/status/1919114435194683607?s=20]

[Schlep on X: "@telefauci @RoCatchers Yea fair, most the dialogue relating to it is people calling him a predator/pedophile and that's really not the case." / X]

Schlep was seen on May 4th and May 11/12th stating that he was contemplating making a video explaining the Dupe situation to try and help debunk the misinformation that i was a predator, which many people were attempting to spread. However Schlep affirms that he would be justifiably criticising me for my irresponsibility which is more than fair.

A document has been provided as well as a Reuploaded Video going more into detail on the dynamic and deconstructing a defamatory catbox document called 'Parlo: A Comprehensive Truth' [also referred to as the 'Parlo Files'] which was maliciously formatted by AI programs such as ChatGPT and was created by a known doxxer who has a history of spreading misinformation. This document was originally taken down by Google for Defamation.
One of the co-creators of the document had retracted their initial claims, NatzPop also backtracked from their original accusations and affirmed that I was not a predator.

Video showing HmmBringer, the co-creator of the document retracting all initial claims he made calling me a pedophile and groomer. [2:28]

The claims that I have a CNC rape fetish too is completely untrue and I directly responded to this in my 3 hour long Response Video. Currently I am in contact with BuckID and I am discussing the situation in depth.

Gwamgo has also released a video accurately covering the entire situation to do with the Dupe accusations, the arrest and the adjudication. While the thumbnail makes it appear as if it is a critical video, it is very much nuanced.

The Burger [ERP DMs] Situation

Another outstanding claim which is often used to smear me as a predator was a brief online relationship I had with a user named Burger / Sourceless / Guilded / Guildest.
This took place between March - April 2022 while I was still 16 and they were 16 turning 17. He was 2 months older than me.

Burger / Guildest was seen stating in an announcement posted in November 2023, that I was NOT a pedophile or groomer and that he was 17 at the time of the sexual messages, while I was 16. Additionally he states that the ERP messages were FULLY consensual. 

People have still continued to share the leaked explicit messages we sent to manufacture a false narrative of grooming. The messages exchanges were mutual, consensual and reciprocal. Current leaked screenshots originally from Burger, only show my one way messages, as Burger systematically purged his side of the messages before he leaked the chat-logs in Late 2022. This screenshot shows an archived chat exchange proving that it was reciprocal and consensual.

There are numerous examples present of Burger also attempting to pressure me for sexual images while I was 16 and he was 17 or insisting that he would send them. I however, made it clear that I did not want to share any illicit images between them as it was illegal. Even though it is commonplace between teens close in age online, I was very anxious about ever engaging in that sort of behaviour.

Truth / Shawty Situation [13]

Since 2022, claims were being spread by malicious users that Parlo knowingly ERP’d and sexually messaged a 13 year old when he was 16. This is false and completely untrue.

LINKED HERE, is a 2024 Evidence Document detailing the numerous deprived actions of one of the original accusers, and debunking the situation.

For context, Shawty made suggestive messages directly to me in my public discord server, with one asking to VC or ‘to f*ck me’. I responded with a yes to the voice chat, to which Shawty misunderstood as a go-ahead to send a myriad of sexual messages. While people were alarmed at the nature of the messages, Parlo shut the behaviour down, stating to them, ‘NOT HERE’, and jokingly replied saying ‘SAVE IT FOR DMS’ to diffuse how personally uncomfortable he was too.

Parlo never had any personal DMS with Shawty, and never engaged in ERP with them or sent any sexual messages to them. Parlo did NOT know the age of Shawty at the time either.

 Christian aka Shawty is also seen stating; ‘nothing sexual went on between me and Parlo’. Furthermore Shawty even states that ‘Parlo doesn’t want any sexual types of situations’. Shawty also states that Parlo was NOT a pedophile. Shawty also did not state that Parlo knew his age.

Discord messages of Shawty stating their age were not seen by Parlo. Parlo did not know who Shawty was at the time of them sending sexually charged messages, they were a random user in the discord server. Using the logic that they sent their age a week prior so it would have been ‘impossible not to have known’, that would essentially involve Parlo or the mod team having to filter through thousands of users, thousands of messages in chat-logs and hundreds of the users messages to locate this one single age admission, that is unplausible, especially when considering the fact that Parlo never engaged with Shawty exempt from a few disjointed cringe joke messages nor was he entirely active in the server. 

When the initial accusations were made against Parlo in April 2022, Parlo was privately shocked about the gravity of the claim, denying that he ever roleplayed with any person who was ‘13 years old’, corroborating the fact that he never knowingly inappropriately engaged with someone he knew to be 13 and adding credence to the fact he did not know Shawty’s age at the time.

Between Shawty and Parlo, there was a less than 3 year age gap between them, Parlo was born on May 2nd 2005 [he was 16], and Shawty was seen stating that they were almost 14 in March 2022.

While it was irresponsible for Parlo to have not checked for the users age, and for not muting / warning / banning Shawty sooner, any insinuation or claim that Parlo knew Shawty’s age and willingly engaged in erotic roleplay with them is false.

This situation is not indicative of pedophilia, nor grooming. The messages were one-sided and not reciprocated.

Malicious users have also attempted to conflate and stitch the Shawty situation with the Burger ERP DMs to give the impression that Parlo was sexually messaging someone he knew to be 13, which is false. As seen with the screenshots presented, Parlo sent no sexual messages to Shawty, the screenshot presented where Parlo had a green joker profile picture and sent sexually charged messages, was to his online partner at the time who was 2 months older than him. Burger was 17, Parlo was 16.

One of the co-creators of the document has also publicly retracted the inclusion of the situation in a document that was created to maliciously smear me as a pedophile with a repeated pattern of behaviour. He admits that it was 'poor evidence'.

The only messages Parlo had sent were harmless responses to Shawty’s originally non-sexual messages. There was no reciprocal sexual RP, it was not facilitated and it was shut down.

Parlo did not engage with Shawty in private DMs. He did not speak to Shawty beyond the weird chat exchange that transpired.

Full conversation exchange of Parlo jokingly telling Truth to ‘save it for DMS’, and not to continue speaking sexually on the server. Parlo was seen finding humour in how bewildered he was from the messages this random user had just sent.

This was a mix of nervous laughter as Parlo was finding the situation quite uncomfortable and awkward. This was also an example of the situation being so absurd he was disconcertedly amused as he was also feeling rather unsettled and thrown off from the ordeal. 

Parlo didn’t necessarily know how to deal with the situation.

Maple / Ashlyn Situation

This screenshot has been used to defame Parlo and lacks fundamental context. Ashlyn, the person Parlo is responding to, is 20 YEARS OLD currently, while Parlo is 21. This screenshot was taken in EARLY 2024. Ashlyn was 17, Parlo was 18.

This comment was an obvious joke between ourselves, making fun of legitimate predators at their expense. Ashlyn / Maple attests to this herself.

Yet another screenshot is taken out of context to make it appear as if Parlo is a predator. Again, Ashlyn / Maple was 17 at this time, Parlo was 18. This was an obvious dark humour / joke comment.

There was only a 1 year 1 month age gap present between them.

Maple also confirms that Parlo did not groom, solicit, abuse or exploit them.

This is also another screenshot used to somehow prove that Parlo was a predator. This being reciprocal joke screenshots once again, between Parlo and  Maple in 2023, while Parlo was 18 and Maple was 17. 

When these out of context screenshots were relitigated in 2024, Maple was seen stating that she reciprocated the same jokes back and was NOT made uncomfortable by them. She also attests there was ‘no real intent behind any of it’. 

The AOC in Maple’s state and the UK is also 16. There was no legal or moral problem with the age gap present.

‘Admission’ Joke Comments

 There are many examples of Parlo throughout the ages of 15-16, making extremely cringe and edgy comments to do with ‘being a predator’ in 2021/2022.

This was because he was in an especially edgy community being Scrimzox [Nathorix’s] discord server, where this behaviour was often commonplace and encouraged. Looking back, Parlo has stated that he is regretful of making such statements and these don’t reflect the person he is today.

[IMAGES ARE PARLO’S STATEMENTS ON THE SITUATION]

Parlo would oftentimes make attention grabbing statements to try and fit into the community and with other older individuals who would reciprocate the kind of humour. To make this distinct clarification, they were NOT serious admissions, the statements were not based with actual malicious intentions and they were just embarrassing statements made by an impressionable and irresponsible minor.

IceCreamGuy, one of the main members of Scrimzox’s discord server, who recorded and screenshotted many examples of Parlo making cringe edgy jokes for comedic purposes, was even seen confirming that it was all simply satirical. Nothing should be taken seriously.

A user was seen attesting that Nathorix's server had actively facilitated degenerate behaviour and humour. Many underaged members believed that the jokes were alright to engage in.

Soulless Screenshots

A few screenshots from 2022 when Parlo was 16, have also been used to try and etch the idea that Parlo was a predator. One of these screenshots took place in Nathorix [Scrimzox’s] Discord server where he jokingly asks a user for ‘gay furry NSFW’. This was not a genuine request at the time, sexual degeneracy in Nathorix’s server was rampant and was a large inside joke that was oftentimes encouraged by higher-ups. Nathorix facilitated this type of environment with their own degenerative and concerning ‘humour’, and this negatively impacted many minors who were involved in circles close to her, including Parlo who was actively being groomed at this time.

Another screenshot shown was a user named Soulless who had sent Furry NSFW content to Parlo in Late February 2022, while Parlo was 16. At this time Soulless had claimed to be 14, and there was a believed less than 2 year age gap between them.

Parlo never shared NSFW content to Soulless, nor did he sexually engage with or ERP with Soulless. Parlo however jokingly requested for Furry NSFW content, to which Soulless openly shared it to him in DMS. Since Parlo was shocked by Soulless’ willingness to share such content and how open he was with doing so, he stated jokingly for more. 

While this was irresponsible and degenerate behaviour, this is not an example of Parlo being a predator or grooming anyone. Parlo never sexually interacted with Soulless.

In discord DMS between both Soulless / Delta [Not to be confused with DeltaScheme], Soulless was seen admitting to having lied about his age being 14 in 2022, while continuing to lie after miscellaneous other claims, such as claiming Parlo was a predator for joking about liking art to do with popular Sonic character Tails, and posting ‘furry NSFW’ in his Discord server, which was not true.

This is the screenshot Soulless has attempted to spread to prove that Parlo is a predator. The context was that Parlo jokingly called a SFW image of Tails posted in Nathorix / Scrimzox’s Discord server as ‘hot’. Parlo was 16 at this time. Parlo then jokingly asked a random user present in the chat [Victor] who claimed to have more artwork of Tails to ‘go to dms now’, [Parlo did not know their age]. Victor then responded jokingly in an aggressive tone to which Parlo joked in response and stated it was ‘based’. Parlo did not know the canon age of Tails.

Clearly Parlo was not taking the conversation seriously. Then Parlo proceeds to make a joke that since Tails has been a character present in online culture for decades, he is technically chronologically older than most Roblox predators. Soulless maliciously attempts to spin this comment as Parlo JUSTIFYING watching Tails NSFW content and trying to make him appear older, despite that being a gross misinterpretation of his joke statement.

Soulless had maliciously blurred an image of fat furry art Parlo had jokingly posted in his server, to make it appear as if it was explicit fetishistic content that he shared to his server filled with minors when he himself was 16. This was untrue. The art was not nude, contained no instances of genitalia, it was an image of inflated, round, fat furries. Soulless later admitted it was not pornographic and it was instead a non-explicit image of 2 fat rounded furries.

Fabricated 13 yr old Screenshots

There are numerous examples of malicious users fabricating screenshots against Parlo to manipulate the narrative and make him appear predatory. In February 2022, screenshots were released from an anonymous burner account called ‘ParlosEnd’, showing what seems to be messages Parlo had sent to a 13 year old girl, while he was 16. 

These screenshots are FAKE / EDITED.

[IMAGES ARE PARLO’S STATEMENTS ON THE SITUATION]

The original accuser does not show the full Discord message logs, only Parlo’s alleged side of the ‘conversation’. Additionally the new evidence the same account showed, were obviously fake / fabricated message logs. 

As Parlo established, there is no date attached to the ‘messages’ sent, with no profile picture being available, and with the name of the account having a lower case ‘p’ instead of a capital.

These messages were proven to have either been outright edited, or taken out of context as they were taken from a 2021/22 Roblox YouTuber Discord server in which Parlo owned. Parlo’s name was red, proving that his account had a high role, and the only server that matched this was the RYC. When cross referencing some of the messages such as ‘Can i trust you’, it can be seen that it was in reference to a completely different subject. They were maliciously taken out of context, while other messages were fabricated and edited.

[IMAGES ARE PARLO’S STATEMENTS ON THE SITUATION]

Roblox YouTuber Milkded attesting the screenshots were taken out of context.

As Parlo establishes, the burner account that posted the fake screenshots, published them during the time that Parlo was streaming, to try and elicit a reaction out of him.

So in conclusion, these screenshots are obviously edited and fabricated, and the messages that were not edited, were taken out of context to give the impression that it was a fluid conversation Parlo was having with a ‘supposed minor’. Despite the environment these messages were based from, being in a Roblox YouTuber Discord server.

DD Situation

On August 17th 2024 Parlo had made a UTTP video reporting on the new YouTube comment bots which were being used to post DD onto the platform, which was a notorious CSAM video created by the prolific predator and sex offender, Peter Scully. 

In this coverage of the situation, Parlo had given an in depth description of how depraved the video was to exacerbate the seriousness and depravity of the situation to the audience and to criticise YouTube, a multi-billion dollar platform on why they had allowed such a horrific, masochistic child abuse video to simply be uploaded numerous times with it bypassing their moderation. 

Now due to this, bad-faith actors have maliciously framed it as if Parlo had actually potentially viewed this content, since he had given an explanation for what allegedly appeared. This is a lie. 

Parlo did not harbour, disseminate, view or possess any material pertaining to DD. 

Parlo’s explanation of what allegedly transpired in the content, came from accounts and information which have been stated in publicly accessible and pre-existing YouTube videos / media posts covering and documenting the crimes of Peter Scully. 

There were numerous videos detailing this situation, some have since been taken down or age restricted.

AGE RESTRICTED VIDEO DETAILING THE SITUATION.

Australia’s WORST pa*dophile - Peter Scully - YouTube 

The title-card introduction of DD was shown in the video and was taken from a publicly accessible clip shown in Catching a monster: Australia’s worst paedophile | 60 Minutes Australia [9:28] AGE RESTRICTED VIDEO DETAILING THE SITUATION.

The UTTP video which was uploaded, was not edited by Parlo. The accusation that he potentially viewed the content and thus had to have access to it is an insane and unsubstantiated lie that has no merit behind it whatsoever.

Public recounting of what took place are detailed in numerous online sources.

LisaFiles

In February - March 2022, while Parlo was 16, he had conducted an investigation into the illegal acts committed by the infamous troll Lisa Gaming ROBLOX and her past associates such as Keiron, Sof and Jade who all had allegedly posted illicit material. 

Lisa was proven to have possessed and distributed CSAM of Keiron too when he was 14 including other minors.

Parlo had decided to create a google document which was co-written by victims who were creating segments to do with their respective situations, this involved users such as Kormanx who was 15, Sarp who was 15, Kirb who was 13 and Choonky who was around 14.

Due to the young age of many members present in the investigation, they were inexperienced and incapable of handling allegations of this severity correctly. While they had good intentions, they went about dealing with CSAM extremely poorly. For example Sarp had a Dropbox featuring evidence of Lisa’s associates posting alleged CSAM in which the screenshots were uncensored. Parlo was taken aback about this and was critical in private. Choonky also had access to alleged uncensored CSAM that a Lisa associate had posted, believing it to have been of him.

Parlo did not archive, save or distribute uncensored CSAM. This is completely untrue. However due to how poorly the evidence was handled, users came away believing Parlo had initially stored illicit content as ‘proof’ on his devices and then used software to then blur and obfuscate the explicit content after saving the uncensored versions as this was alluded to in text on the document. This is untrue.

Once again this claim is completely circumstantial, and the part of the document that was criticised for making this seem apparent, was not even written by Parlo, it was typed by Sarp.

Sarp was seen on Twitter in reply to Parlo, making it clear that he was the one who saved the evidence and blurred it to report the material to discord. He also affirms that he had no bad intentions. [1st March 2022]

https://web.archive.org/web/20220301203025/https:/twitter.com/scrxvp/status/1498756880151232513

 A call-out tweet was made by a commentary orbiter named Smaggle showing the statement present in the document which was made by Sarp, where he explained that they blurred the image and then saved it as evidence which they used in the document. Smaggle initially believed this was typed by Parlo.

Other commentary YouTubers such as Tipster then followed up, using this to directly accuse Parlo of having ‘saved illicit material’ to his device. 

A document in which was created in late November 2025 and taken down by Google for defamation on 25th August 2026, was seen making the direct claim that; ‘Parlo explained that he downloaded the said image onto his computer as evidence AND censored it for the document’. 

This is categorically untrue and a complete lie.

As seen, these are screenshots of the segment that Sarp personally wrote and put together themselves. In these pages which were present in the document, it contained their testimony and screenshot evidence from their own discord messages as they were personally a victim of numerous crimes committed by Lisa Gaming ROBLOX’s close friends and associates such as Dior and Sof.

This segment was written in their perspective and in first person, proving that Parlo did not contribute to the evidence collection of this portion of the document.

These pages came before the problematic screenshot in which was later called out. It is obvious that Parlo did not construct these segments due to the formatting structure and word usage of the paragraphs being extremely different.

The next page present involved the problematic screenshot which was blurred. This screenshot was under the subsection Sarp had created detailing the immoral actions and crimes committed by Sof.

A clarification was later made to the document, making it clear that the statement under the problematic image was not written by Parlo but rather Sarp.

The page after the segment covering Sof’s dissemination of illicit material was Sarp calling them out for scamming. This is yet more evidence to corroborate the fact that the entire segment was created solely by Sarp.

Smaggle also misunderstood the situation, believing that the statement he thought Parlo typed, meant he initially saved the illicit content AND THEN blurred it [meaning that he could be in possession of uncensored content].

This is however not true and this was misinterpreted from the initial statement Sarp made regardless as he stated he BLURRED the content BEFORE saving.

https://x.com/BlueSquidComms/status/1498761625339371520?s=20 

Smaggle was then seen affirming that Parlo actually didn’t do anything and that Sarp was the one who constructed that portion of the document. However it was hard to discern that since it initially was seen as if Parlo had put the entire evidence compilation together himself.

Kormanx who was present during the LisaFiles situation also attests that Sarp was the individual who mismanaged the situation.

Kormanx once again corroborated the fact that Sarp had access to the material, not Parlo.

The GoFundMe Situation

Trigger warning; mentions of domestic abuse

After Parlo received 2 strikes on his YouTube channel and was arrested due to a false police report made by NatzPop on September 11th 2025, Parlo has returned with trauma from the police, extreme mental health issues and anxiety. On top of this all Parlo was also temporarily homeless in October due to a domestic abuse incident.

Since the channel received 2 community guideline strikes, this prevented him from creating content for numerous weeks. Additionally Parlo also did not wish to upload after this period as he was at risk of suspension. This caused Parlo’s income to become heavily affected in the process, all videos were private and he was earning nothing.

On September 28th 2025, he created a GoFundMe, talking about the arrest and how he is back on antidepressants to cope with the anxiety from the entire situation and the severe depression he was experiencing.

Many people have attempted to spin the narrative that Parlo spent the money garnered from the GoFundMe, on a new iPhone and laptop which were to replace the old devices which were confiscated by police. Additionally people also assumed the money garnered was used to pay for a plane ticket for Internet Adjacent to meet with Parlo in London. This is untrue.

For clarification, everyone has been refunded months ago.

If images too small to read use CTRL +  [+] and [-] to zoom in/out [or you can click the image]

As seen in the screenshots, everyone who had originally donated had been refunded months ago. All names have been redacted for their personal privacy.

The screenshots show individual GoFundMe transactions.

This has been addressed in Vrail’s video; The Truth Behind Parlo... [5:02] 

Email evidence is provided corroborating the fact that everyone who donated to the fundraiser was refunded. Nationwide bank payment history also shows Parlo paying the £540 back to its recipients on 17th November 2025.

The GoFundMe had asked anyone willing enough to donate to Parlo to help him pay for food, rent and other amenities during the time of his channel being striked and him receiving no revenue. Parlo had also stated that the money potentially may be used to fund any legal action that he does decide to take against users such as NatzPop who made a false police report against him. 

Not once was it stated in the fundraiser that Parlo was broke.

Parlo has taken accountability for his lack of transparency and ignorance when it initially came to responding to the situation.

Parlo acknowledges that the GoFundMe made it appear as if he was in a more financially volatile position than he actually was. 

Parlo had also released a Response Video in January 2026 going over the GoFundMe situation and expressing accountability for his egregious mistake.

My Response - Parlo Reupload 

GoFundMe Situation - 14:55 

Parlo had displayed his payment transaction history from after he received the GoFundMe donation money up until he had donated the money back in November. As seen, the money used was spent on food via Uber Eats, as well as for transport and buying products at his local shop.

Parlo had also spent thousands on his expensive university accommodation since he was homeless at the time and was unable to stay at his fathers house due to a domestic abuse incident that was recorded and reported to police.

Proof is provided via transaction receipts, that thousands of pounds was spent on rent for his accommodation on 5th November 2025.

On October 14th, Parlo was instructed to verify his account before the money from the GoFundMe could be transferred into his account. On October 17th, he received an email stating that the money is being deposited and it may take a couple of days.

The money was then transferred on 21st October 2025.

Many people have made the claim that the money from the GoFundMe was used to purchase Wolfgang’s plane ticket which is not true. Parlo has transferred money to Wolfgang for him to purchase his plane ticket on 7th October 2025. This was 2 weeks before the money from the GoFundMe was transferred into his account.

Now while this may prove that Parlo did not have the intent to have directly used the money from the GoFundMe on the plane ticket, he certainly is not immune to any criticism, in fact far from it and even he agrees himself as seen in a large statement he made in a Discord message.

Parlo essentially states that he did not have any malice when mismanaging the GoFundMe, however states that he should be rightly criticised for making it seem like he needed money for basic necessities, but then the following month he spends thousands on expensive devices. 

The laptop was purchased on 13th October with the new iPhone being purchased on 13th September 2025, 2 days after the arrest. Once again they were purchased week[s] before the GoFundMe money was transferred into Parlo’s account.

Now the iPhone was a necessary purchase for communication as the police had essentially confiscated his devices once he was apprehended. This is customary for them to do given the gravity of the charge he was being reprimanded for, despite the original report being completely false. This iPhone was also purchased over 2 weeks before the GoFundMe was created on September 28th.

As mentioned earlier in Parlo’s aforementioned 3 hour Response video, he had addressed the GoFundMe situation by stating;

‘I was not at all transparent as I should have been about my finances and that is inherently deceptive for me to have done. Despite the platform I have accommodated and a responsibility and influence that also comes with it, I proceed to continue to screw up time and time again on monolithic levels and that has now caused to family, friends, and to people who have trusted me very much with their money and have donated to me because they believed I was initially at a worse financial point and I didn't

recognize the damage I had caused until now. I made excuses originally and dodged taking accountability in the original Discord call when I was first confronted because I was so naive. I simply couldn't understand what I did was fundamentally wrong. Money is fungible, so even if I didn't use the money on the ticket and laptop, the money I received from the GoFundMe essentially recuperated and replenished the loss, so that is absolutely worthy of criticism. I take full accountability for the act of scamming, deceiving my fans, and violating their trust in the process and for that reason, I have taken steps to give the money back after I had my dad transfer funds from my account which I'm actively using to refund everyone who donated to the GoFundMe. And I will ensure to never make a GoFundMe again because I've earned the trust of my audience and it simply cannot be amended. I'm not in a position where I should ever make a GoFundMe again.’

Parlo received 2 community guideline strikes which were both rejected. The second strike that he received on October 2nd 2025, effectively made it so he couldn’t upload for 2 weeks. The strikes expired in December meaning he had to private all videos and not upload for numerous months to ensure he didn’t get a final strike which would result in channel termination.

Parlo had made a discord announcement on 18th October detailing how his father attacked him and put his hands around his neck. Parlo then shows a photo of him outside at night running away from home.

Excerpts have been shown of the recording of the incident. The full video showing the extent of the situation exists and has not been uploaded for privacy and personal reasons.

Parlo had reported the situation to police and was visited by them at his friends house to give a recounting of the situation.

Parlo was seen communicating to his friend [BLUE] that he was staying at that he was thankful that he was able to stay at his house. Parlo was also seen stating to another friend [RED] that he had nowhere else to live at the time and that the entire situation is severely affecting his mental health.

More proof has been shown, proving that Parlo had reached out to contact a transfer specialist from the GoFundMe team to ensure the money he put back into the GoFundMe, would then be redistributed back to all the donors involved. This action was clarified when Parlo stated in reply; ‘I have donated these funds back in order for you to refund my donors’. This took place on November 13th 2025.

Parlo’s relationship with his father has improved as of recently, this has only been shown as proof behind Parlo’s claims and does not serve to relitigate past instances.

Wolfgang SA Situation

Trigger warning; sexual assault & explicit themes

Coupled with the mismanagement of the GoFundMe situation, I had also received criticism for the way I went about addressing the sexual assault I experienced from the disgraced content creator Online Antiks also known as Wolfgang in a Google Document.

As of currently I have been dealing with the situation legally and have sent appropriate evidence and message logs to law enforcement while communicating with them. The situation has now been escalated.

What transpired when I came out about what happened was countless people mocking the explicit nature of the extremely personal and vulnerable situation while also accusing me of lying about the assault. This is completely untrue.
Wolfgang has admitted on stream to publicly lying when he initially claimed he had consent to engage in a penetrative act with me and in actuality he had engaged with me without explicit consent, this is definitively sexual assault.
I go further in detail on Wolfgang's lies and twisting of the narrative in my RESPONSE VIDEO [1:08:48-1:37:07], as he has also engaged in others acts with me without my verbal consent.
An absence of a no is not consent and my mutual explicit messages do not manufacture consent for future actions, my hesitancy, excuses to disengage and engagement only due to a fear of reprisal is emblematic of a fawn response and my reuploaded response video covers this in detail.
Public perception shifted focus away from the serious topic of sexual assault, and focused on mocking a small segment of my testimony being the 'Cinderella' which was not even mine, allowing for the situation to not be taken seriously / minimalised and for Wolfgang to get away with his behaviour, despite him having violated the boundaries of other people before and engaging with them without clear consent most notably during Anthrocon 2024.

I was also falsely accused of being a predator despite Wolfgang being 21 when I was 20. Additionally the context for why I released this document and went into detail about the situation was deliberately obfuscated, making it appear as if I had malicious intensions when sharing the document with people claiming 'I wanted to expose minors explicit content'. This is a lie.I made sure to include a content warning at the start of the document that unfortunately wasn't noticed by many people and my intensions were to voice my side in detail about how I was violated and sexually assaulted. I went about dealing with the situation horribly and I am extremely regretful and embarrassed by my past conduct. I should have sought out legal action while also not going into as much detail as I did, however the insinuation that I did this with predatory undertones is categorically untrue. 
Everyone has been refunded the full amount [$540] and I have apologised profusely for what took place.

As seen in the screenshots, everyone who had originally donated had been refunded months ago. All names have been redacted for their personal privacy.

The screenshots show individual GoFundMe transactions.

'Racism' / Slurs Accusations

A popular video that is seen being circulated on Twitter is audio of me saying numerous slurs on call in 2023. This video is oftentimes shared as people believe I was aggressively saying these words in malice against someone. This is untrue.
Firstly I can claim the slurs, I am both pansexual and genderfluid. My gender identity has always been something I have tried to keep private because it is a very vulnerable part of me but since I want to make this clear for context, I have been struggling with body dysmorphia for years and this has been something my close friends know.

The audio was from a joke call between me and my friends, including a user named Maple. Maple herself is transgender and has come out several times to confirm that I was not attacking her for her gender identity and that it was all intended just to be humorous in private. You can hear audible laughing in the background of the audio towards the end [0:12-0:16]. There were no racist statements said whatsoever, the audio was cut out at the end where I stated it was a joke.

The audio was then jokingly leaked by a user named Vintage who I was on good terms with, before it continued to be spread and got maliciously twisted by disgraced YouTuber Sydiced.I absolutely do regret acting that immaturely in 2023 and apologise for the way I conducted myself, but the claims that I am somehow transphobic, homophobic or bigoted due to this is completely false.

Maple was seen in my 2023 Response Video also attesting that they did not take what I said seriously whatsoever and that it was not a big deal. [17:19 - 17:37]

People have also continued to re-litigate 7 year old screenshots from when I was 14 in 2019, where I made abrasive and unacceptable comments in regards to Asian people in reply to someone who was actively threatening and insulting me. I have apologised numerous times for these statements and have taken steps to never repeat them. At this time in 2019-2020 I received constant death threats which I replied aggressively to.

In early 2023 when I was 17 I had also engaged in extremely edgy humour in closed internet circles for attention, this involved making cringe and immature comments/jokes in reference to Hitler. In a now archived response video, I took full public accountability and acknowledged that these joke comments, while NOT genuine statements intended to glorify any controversial ideology, were still not acceptable whatsoever.

During the same time while I was 17, I had also created purposefully awfully drawn KKK stickman images in Gartic phone as a joke in private between friends. This was then leaked by a user named Breone who later admitted he did this out of spite and that it was 'bs on his part', while also conceding that this was a joke.Nonetheless I have also apologised and taken accountability for engaging in this degenerate humour because it makes me appear extremely pathetic and unstable. These were not genuine statements nor advocations of beliefs and should not be taken seriously.

Homotopia

Homotopia was originally intended to be an LGBTQ+ inclusive discord server Parlo made, where he could converse with mutuals he had on Twitter under the ‘CammyFemboy’ alias. Parlo never had the intention to have the server be NSFW. It was created on May 14th 2023, 12 days after Parlo had turned 18.

Server rules told users to adhere to Discord’s TOS. The NSFW channel made on the server by a pedophile that Parlo oversaw was banned, was removed in the first hour as it was made without his knowledge.

Parlo was proven with archived discord message logs from the server, to have NOT been active for large portions of its tenure. He did NOT know the extent of the problem. Parlo’s inactivity has also been attested by ex-moderators [1] [2], and past members. Parlo also admitted at the time that he was not online for many days, he mainly used the server for venting and then removed messages.

One of the youngest proven people in the server, Pyro, was 15 turning 16, he was 2 years 1 month younger than Parlo. This situation for clarification is NOT indicative of grooming or pedophilia against Parlo, such accusations have no basis, evidence or merit behind them. One of the original accusers and leakers of this server went back on their initial claims and confirmed Parlo was ‘not guilty’ nor a ‘predator’.

This is an example of negligence however and Parlo has taken accountability and ensured to never own a discord server since.

The server had a high moderator to member ratio [4-6 mods, ~90 members]. Many of the moderators were between 16-17 and bore the responsibility for the server during Parlo’s inactivity, due to this the server became increasingly degenerate with moderation becoming relaxed. Parlo had also entrusted Nathorix [an adult] with moderator permissions in hopes he would be responsible. This was before his worse allegations were known, and at the time where he was still manipulating Parlo as this was at the tail end of the grooming from when he was 17.

Suggestive images and cropped NSFW was posted, but there is currently no evidence of nude content or CSAM ever having been disseminated or posted. 

Parlo was NOT active

Archived Discord server logs of the Homotopia server show numerous users, including ‘Bellzybub’ who was an admin [orange role], stating that Parlo [Cam/Cammy] was not active in the server and would oftentimes disappear abruptly.

Pyro was also seen attesting that Parlo was not active in the server.

Numerous Private Discord messages between Parlo [Cam] and his mutuals showing that he was not active for numerous days throughout the tenure of the server. [May 14th 2023 - May 31st 2023]. Parlo was seen stating on the 19th, that due to a user named XDGAMER stalking and harassing him, he would ‘need to go on the down low’. Parlo is also seen acknowledging his inactivity, apologizing for it in the process. A user was then seen stating; ‘that is what admins are for’. Showing that Parlo was reliant on his moderation team upon his inactivity.

Parlo was seen stating in his server on the 23rd May, that he wanted to leave the discord and transfer ownership to someone else since he didn’t feel like he fit the community anymore since his inactivity in a deleted message. In DMs with a REDACTED user, Parlo was seen not having responded to them for numerous days.

This user suggested for Parlo to give ownership to ‘Bellzy’ with Parlo asking for why.

Due to Parlo’s inactivity a user had believed that Pyro was the actual owner of the discord server.

Pyro states that he acts as the pseudo owner, effectively meaning that while he retains no ownership permissions [hence ‘fake’ or pseudo owner], however he acts as a substitute of Parlo to manage the entire discord server while he remains inactive. 

It was due to this that led the server to become increasingly more degenerate and moderation to become more relaxed and less enforced, as teenagers who are rather irresponsible at their age aren’t the best people to be entrusted with moderation permissions.

Both an ex-admin ‘Allyn’ [TheChessNerd] and an active member of the server ‘BigGreezy’ attested that Parlo was not active in the server. Greezy was seen stating ‘it was pretty rare to see Cammy’.

Greezy is seen acknowledging that the server became NSFW most likely due to the mods not necessarily understanding how to establish strict server moderation procedures since they were both irresponsible and immature at their age, which is understandable.

In the few examples where Parlo used the General chat to discuss topics, it was normally vent messages as he was experiencing a period of intense mental anguish and depression, which was further hindered by internet stalkers and harassers. Parlo shortly after his vent periods, wiped and removed his messages. Users were seen attempting to console him and offer him advice, where Parlo would often discuss his problems with depression, loneliness and stress/ anxiety at his age.

Archived Discord server logs showing that Parlo vented about relationships and depression [anti-depressants]. 

Malicious individuals had attempted to claim that Parlo wiped his messages to conceal his involvement and complicity in the discord server if it ever came to light. This is a complete lie and archives prove most of his messages were venting.

Parlo purged his vent messages instinctively after a couple of minutes / hours as during this time he also operated the RYC discord server, where he would also vent to other YouTubers and users. Breone however had supplied both XDGAMER and other cyberstalkers / doxxers associated in that group, chat messages of Parlo sharing personal information about his life, to which they used to mock and harass him even years LATER.

Leaked vent screenshots of Parlo discussing in 2021/2022 [while he was 16] that his father domestically and verbally abused him in a Roblox YT Discord Server.

These messages were used to mock and ridicule Parlo by XDGAMER and his associates.

Parlo was seen being extremely scared and paranoid in his server over XDGAMER as his harassment induced panic attacks and pushed him to suicide.

The ages

The server was made to originally be 16+ but was then changed to 15+, as Pyro wanted to be moderator and actively present in the server. At this time he was 15, turning 16 in a month. Since the server was not intended to be NSFW, reducing the age allowed by a year was not seen as being a massive contention point or problem.

There were only 3 known 15 year olds in the server, Tundra, Taz and Pyro. Tundra turned 16 during the final days and was not entirely active, nor engaged with Parlo. 

Taz was 15 with his date of birth unclear, he was not majorly active and did not engage with Parlo but he did post suggestive photos.

Pyro however was one of the most active members present in the discord server and was an admin, with him also interacting a lot with Parlo.

Pyro was a large contention point in this situation due to the suggestive comments he made and images in which he posted. 

His age being 15, was enough for people to accuse Parlo of being a predator for harbouring him in the server as Pyro was seen as the youngest member present.

However for clarification, the age gap between Parlo and Pyro was only 2 years 1 month. 

Pyro turned 16 on 13th June 2023, meaning his date of birth was 13th June 2007. Parlo’s date of birth was 2nd May 2005, meaning the age gap between them was only 2 years 1 month. Parlo never sent NSFW content to Pyro, never groomed, solicited or abused him. 

(Pyro’s Twitter tag and name have been censored for their privacy) 

The claim Parlo was a predator merely came from the fact that Pyro’s age was 15 and they deduced the claim from the apparent age gap present.

(Twitter conversation on January 10th 2024)

This chat exchange shows the amicable and friendly conversation Parlo and Pyro had with one another. Confirming that Pyro holds no bad feelings or resentment towards Parlo. Pyro is seen conceding that he and the other moderation team members could have done better and it wasn’t regulated well. 

Parlo had also expressed discomfort in some of the images that were posted in the server without his knowledge, specifically the suggestive image Pyro took of him in boxers. Despite the image not being explicit, nude or definitively illegal, it should have NOT been posted regardless whatsoever.  It could have put Pyro in a vulnerable position of any bad actors who wanted to take advantage of them as past individuals such as Dae. Dae met Pyro before Homotopia.

Parlo however only ever knew of this image being posted after he read XDGAMERS document covering it all. He never accessed IRL-Media and only posted in General chat on a few occasions.

Parlo’s messages were only sent in #general chat as seen in archived screenshots.

Malicious individuals such as XDGAMER who created the original document, also attempted to present the narrative as if 43 year olds were allowed in a server and environment where 15 year olds were present in. To prove this, they show a user joking about their age being 43, this conversation was maliciously cropped.

In archived chat-logs of the discord server, it was evident that the user had clearly stated that they were in actuality, a teenager. This was deliberately obfuscated from the initial document to give the impression that this server facilitated grooming between adults and minors with considerable age gaps.

Original Accusers

The original Homotopia document was created under the alias of XDGAMER, who was a known cyberstalker and harasser. This alias most likely was run by numerous individuals, XDGAMER was known for posting CP to minors, posting NSFW to minors and doxxing numerous minors.

Their actions have been extensively laid out in this document.

XDGAMER was notified about Parlo’s Cammy Twitter account and Discord server when Breone had overheard Parlo discussing it on call with Nathorix and had found the account in her follower list. Breone then whistle blew the information to XDGAMER out of spite against Parlo. Breone himself has allegations of inappropriately engaging with a 15 year old girl when he was 18.

Breone was seen extensively bragging about his contribution to leaking the Homotopia Discord server and aiding / supplying XDGAMER, a known CP distributor and doxxer, with valuable information. Breone was even seen stating that he effectively ‘backstabbed’ Parlo and was ‘actively whistleblowing’ to XDGAMER at one point. 

He is then seen belittling his actions once being confronted by Parlo, straying away from their past admissions of ‘actively whistleblowing’ to now playing down his association with XDGAMER. Breone was also seen distancing himself from the initial expose document that he helped facilitate with the information he provided.

Breone was further seen stating that he now believed Parlo was innocent for the Homotopia situation, stating that ‘I think ur fine tbh’, along with establishing that anyone calling him a predator for the situation is wrong.

Breone also states that he doesn’t believe Parlo is actually guilty, which is a stark contrast compared to his previous comments and this represents a clear backtrack and retraction of claims.

Server Rules

On the day that the server was created [14th May 2023], Parlo had entrusted an admin named Dae who was 19, to create the server rules as Parlo had in the past, always be reliant on other people to moderate servers and uphold the rules, such as in RYC and ParloCord.

However a large contention point came with the fact that Dae did NOT clearly specify in the rules that NSFW was prohibited which ended up causing problems down the line. 

They had also on the first day of the servers creation, made an 18+ NSFW channel which Parlo had promptly removed 1 hour later.

This proves that Parlo’s intention for the server was that it should NOT have been an NSFW environment, hence why he stepped in.

While mods have attested that the server was intended to be SFW and that it was against the rules to post NSFW material, the gradual lack of moderation led to more suggestive content being posted such as cropped porn content or thigh pictures that teetered or surpassed the line of acceptable content, which in turn led other people to believe that the server was inherently NSFW and thus led to a knock-on effect of progressively more NSFW content being posted.

In the rules presented by Dae, it heavily urged users to comply with Discord’s TOS and that any illegal material was prohibited.

The Discord Community Guidelines were then linked and embedded in the rules making them easy to access, which specified to users that people under the age of 18 should NOT engage in inappropriate conduct. 

It also urges users to NOT engage in any sexual conduct with users under the age of 18. It also makes clear that NSFW content should not be made available to users under the age of 18 either.

However these Guidelines were not sufficiently laid out as individual, separate rules and there was no clear communication. Due to this, people got the wrong impression of the server, due to the environment it fostered and it became increasingly degenerate in the process. Many people most likely did not read too much into the rules that were presented and Discord Guidelines embedded either.

As shown in this example, here are the many rules that users were told to stringently abide by, when the Discord Community Guidelines were embedded in the Homotopia Rules channel.

Another member was seen attesting that it was known that it was against the rules to post NSFW content, however this rule was loosely enforced.

Pyro was seen attesting that it was against the rules to post NSFW material, however he did follow up by stating that inappropriate comments and jokes were made, however it is unclear whether he actually knew the full extent of how bad the server delved into degeneracy. Pyro also stated that there were no inappropriate images of minors in the server and that CSAM was not allowed. While the latter is true, the image he had taken of him in boxers was objectively inappropriate and subjective. While it was not illegal or explicit, it should NOT have been posted in the first place, and it seems that in 2023 when Pyro was asked these questions, he did not know how problematic images of that nature could be since he attempted to argue that his bulge was covered in the image and was not visible. As it is clear however, this does not mean it was appropriate or acceptable whatsoever.

My statement in regards to this from 2024.

While the moderators and admins [orange roles] were adamant about NSFW content being banned, since they were still young and inexperienced with the responsibility that comes with operating a discord server, they were indecisive and not well versed about the fine lines between suitable and non-suitable content.

For example they allowed and even contributed in posting memes that were essentially cropped pornography or suggestive in nature. While nothing explicit was shown and these examples of content were popular copy-paste memes which have been seen on YouTube and Twitter, they were not appropriate whatsoever in an environment which contained minors.

Therefore perhaps that is why there was no surprise that incrementally more examples of non-suitable content was posted, the mods continued to become more accepting of inappropriate conversations and in turn became more relaxed and complacent. Many of the members were also close in age [15/16 -18] so they possibly felt more comfortable in letting their guard down and being more open with peers which obviously came as a detriment to themselves and also contributed to the increasing degeneracy. 

Bad actors such as Dae who was 19 and was an outlier in terms of age had been inappropriately engaging with many of the members long before the creation of Homotopia and was promptly banned when information came out. The oldest known member being Nathorix who was 23, was rarely active and was not present at the start of the server.

Parlo, when attempting to address the Homotopia allegations in 2023, relied on testimony from members who were active in the server, such as Connor who was around 18 at this time. While Connor was adamant that the server was not intended to be an NSFW server and ‘no one posted NSFW material’, the images he posted referenced from the XDGAMER document, contradicted this statement. This shows the sentiment at the time by users who believed that if media wasn’t inherently explicit or was cropped, it could not have been NSFW, this mentality was shared by Parlo in his first Homotopia response video in 2023 which he has later admitted was not well presented and dishonest.

The examples presented while not showing actual nudity, are suggestive in nature and not safe to be posted in an environment containing minors.

In reference to the IRL pictures many members of the server took who were minors at the time, they were not explicit however this does not mean they should have been posted or disseminated under any circumstances. Many examples posted were stomach or thigh pictures. They were suggestive in nature and many of the members have acknowledged years later that posting content like this directly puts them in harm's way of potential bad actors who may seek to take advantage of them.

These people should not be put on blast or blamed for their past actions of engaging in this behaviour. It was all of a product of what the degenerate environment created and how it affected impressionable teenagers. Many parties have admitted over time that they have completely changed their mindset and what communities they engage in now.

While the images were not CSAM, this does not at all change the fact that images like these should not have been disseminated and sufficient action should have been taken to have mitigated this. 

XDGAMER had censored the images with a large black box which gave the impression that the images contained nudity and were explicit, this is not the case. With this specified however as mentioned, this does not change the fact that these images were not appropriate to have been posted. The images posted in the server are indefensible.

As established earlier, young members attempted to rationalise the images they posted by simply believing that since it did not contain nudity, it simply wasn’t suggestive or extremely questionable. This is why moderators seemingly took no action against users who posted thigh images or tummy photos, since they were also engaging in the same behaviour since it was positively encouraged with compliments.

Parlo at the time of making his initial 2023 response, did not have any access to the Homotopia archives nor watched the entire videos of YouTuber’s such as Gone_Fishinq who covered the situation. He had no idea to the full extent of degeneracy that was contained in the server.

Additionally he had taken strides to argue semantics claiming that some of the inappropriate memes sent were not NSFW as he did not fully understand the definition rigour of the term at the time. He operated by the aforementioned mindset that since the media contained no nudity it must not be NSFW, which isn’t the case.

Parlo has also defended the images to which he posted on his Twitter account and some images which were posted to the Homotopia server, not knowing the extent of how bad some were. He argued that the stomach photos were gym progress pictures. Now Parlo has acknowledged as of recently, that despite the fact that users including him were doing workouts, this does not serve as a suitable blanket defense nor does it alleviate the fact that most pictures obviously have provocative undertones. 

Parlo was seen admitting that he holds himself accountable for the creation of the server and that he wrongly went about addressing the situation initially, by attempting to deflect the situation by bringing up the criminal actions of the original accuser, rather than actually addressing the points made.

Parlo also highlights his mistake in making the server since he was woefully inexperienced with maintaining a community by himself, without his trustworthy moderation team that he had on his Parlo alias.

Furthermore Parlo makes it clear that his intentions were never to foster an NSFW environment when he first created the server since he reduced the age of users allowed to be 15+, he states that since he did this, at the time he saw this as not a point of contention as if he wanted an NSFW environment, he would have made it 18+, proving his initial intentions to have been harmless but flawed.

This can be corroborated by the fact that Dae had created an NSFW channel in the first hour of the servers creation behind Parlo’s back, and he immediately deleted it.

As seen in the introductions channel of the server, numerous members had made their ages known, with many being around the same age [16-17]

Nathorix

Parlo’s dynamic and association to Nathorix has been addressed in detail under the Nathorix section of this document. This segment of the Homotopia accusations will cover the reason for why Parlo gave moderation permissions to him, as well as Nathorix’s degeneracy in the server and his attempts to warp the narrative when his actions were brought to light. 

For clarification, at this time Parlo did not believe Nathorix to have been a malicious serial predator and did not know what Nathorix had posted in the server until after it was highlighted in XDGAMER’s document.

Now as established, Parlo had required more moderators as he wanted a high member to moderator/admin ratio in the discord server. Parlo was aware that he needed an environment that was highly moderated to ensure nothing violatory was posted, as it would require a lot of effort to ensure that the server did not delve into degeneracy. Parlo had also wanted to have moderators who were responsible and above the age of 18.

While it has aged horribly, at the time since Parlo relied on Nathorix for a substantial period of time, often coming to them to vent about his personal struggles and asking them for life advice since they were one of the only adults who he could essentially trust and rely on. 

Since Nathorix had known about the CammyFemboy alias, they had joined the discord server and had asked if they were allowed moderation perms to ensure that minors did not post any suggestive or inappropriate content. Since Parlo had personally believed that Nathorix learnt from their past actions and judging by the massive community-wide acceptance he had back into the Roblox scene, he entrusted Nathorix with admin permissions.

As seen in a tweet posted by the Roblox YouTuber Jackeryz, Parlo on a deleted account in August 2023, was seen explaining to Jackeryz that according to him Nathorix had known that minors were in the Homotopia server and told him that he wanted to ensure no NSFW was posted either by them, or any other individual. He had also explained that they didn’t want the message leaked since they were worried about the repercussions they may receive from Nathorix for stating this. Jackeryz was then seen stating that Parlo’s association with Nathorix does them no favours, this was before it was known that Nathorix had been coddling, grooming and manipulating Parlo for years.

This conversation had taken place since Nathorix’s response to their allegations of misconduct in the Homotopia discord server was extremely confusing and was illogical. Nathorix had initially attempted to gaslight Parlo and the Roblox Community by claiming that they asked for moderation permissions to ‘ban any minors from entering the discord server’. This is despite the rules and introduction channel making it clear that minors were allowed and present in the discord server.

It was revealed that 5 days after Nathorix had joined the server and was given the responsibility of moderation perms to uphold a non-degenerate environment, they had actively contributed to it instead, by posting an extremely suggestive image of their stomach and anime underwear in the server which contained numerous minors.

Archived screenshots at the time also show that Nathorix was barely active in the server despite affirming that they would actively secure the community. Nathorix had affirmed that they ‘banned minors’, under the belief that the server was an adult environment that still disallowed NSFW content, however no proof of this has ever been provided.

While Nathorix did not go on to groom or take advantage of any of the members present in the server, this was a massive oversight and huge mistake ever allowing someone like them to engage with such a community.

Jackeryz was seen posting another message Parlo had sent which further corroborates the fact that Nathorix most likely knew minors were present in the Homotopia server.

I had also published a video titled 'Taking Accountability' in December 2023 where I took responsibility for the Homotopia situation and called out Nattie Forsyth / Scrimzox / Nathorix for their actions.

Nathorix Groomed Parlo

Nathorix / Nattie Forsyth / Scrimzox / Natigska is a prolific Roblox pedophile who has sexually engaged with numerous minors throughout 2017 - 2023.

This document will prove that Nathorix actively inappropriately engaged with Parlo throughout 2021 - 2023, while he was 16 -17 years of age. Nathorix was 21 - 22. There is a 4 year 10 month age gap between them. 

Parlo’s age was public, Nathorix knew he was underaged.

Nathorix sent porn directly to Parlo and other minors in a GC when he was 16 in 2022. Nathorix moaned and made inappropriate noises in calls with Parlo and other minors in 2022 while he was 16, he was 21.

Nathorix spoke about sexual based topics in front of Parlo and other minors, discussing her own sex life, while trying to ask Parlo sexual questions on his own sex life, when he was 16-17. In Dec 2022, while Parlo was 17 and Nathorix was 22, he decided to meet Parlo in real life at night and offer him drugs.

Nathorix also allegedly sent other instances of NSFW to Parlo while he was a minor, including images of their thighs in 2023. Nathorix had also allowed Parlo to gain access to her NSFW lewds account when he was 17.

Nathorix also suicide baited Parlo and manipulated him by playing down her own allegations, attempting to pit him against other YouTubers, and also emotionally manipulating him for numerous years pretending that he was ‘there for him’. 

Nathorix also participated in spreading revenge porn of Parlo with his friend.

Google Drive Compiling Evidence of Nathorix Grooming Parlo

Video of Nathorix making sexual jokes to Parlo when he was 16 on stream.

When Parlo confronted Nathorix in February 2025 in regards to them boasting about their sex life to him and other minors present in a Roblox YouTuber Discord server in Late 2022 - Early 2023, when he was 17, Nathorix was seen admitting this was true.

Parlo also states that Nathorix would pry Parlo for more information about his own sex life from when he was 16-17, to which Nathorix affirms was true and replies stating he was just ‘nosey’ and that she was surprised. Nathorix then states that they shouldn’t have been asking but they found it funny. Then they continue to belittle their actions by stating ‘in a year’ [when Parlo was not a minor], they could then talk about sexual topics to them. Keep in mind he was 22 at this time, Parlo was 17.

Nathorix was once again confronted on how she boasted about getting money for sending explicit pictures to commentary YouTuber Jalyn’s ex-girlfriend. Nathorix admitted they did say this information in front of minors including Parlo in a Roblox YouTuber Discord server. Nathorix also admitted that they made inappropriate comments and jokes in front of Parlo and other members.

Parlo would go on to confront Nathorix on how he sent him Twitter links to images of his thighs to which he posted in 2022 [3 years after 2019]. Parlo also stated that Nathorix sent him NSFW memes such as an explicit MrBeast picture meme.

Nathorix responded to the claims that he sent images of his thighs to Parlo, by lying about the timeline. He stated that 3 years after his 2019 mentality would have been 2022, therefore Parlo was 18. This is untrue. Parlo was 17 in 2022, he was born in 2005.

Nathorix then goes on to deflect claiming that Parlo sent him ‘stuff from Twitter too’, instead of denying the fact he sent suggestive thigh images of himself to Parlo while he was still a minor and he was 22.

Parlo then goes on to state that the MrBeast D pic meme was sent while he was 17, and that his CammyFemboy account was created in April 2023, while he was still 17. Nathorix then later backtracked and stated he could have sent the NSFW content to Parlo when he was 17, however he ‘isn’t going to pretend he remembers exactly’.

[MUGEN] was seen showing messages between both him and Parlo in Late March 2023, where Parlo had stated that Nathorix sent him images of her thighs, this was when he was 17.

These private messages took place in Late March 2023 and Parlo had stated that ‘she [Nathorix] posted her thighs to me once’. This establishes how Nathorix posted suggestive images of herself to Parlo well before he was an adult, as this happened in the past.

Nathorix is seen affirming that everything they did was completely 'legal' bearing absolutely no responsibility for their own actions. They then deflected to the pornographic video Parlo had sent to try and shift the focus away from their degenerative actions. Nathorix then admits to sending images of their thighs to Parlo when he was a minor, however belittling it to 'leg images', being intellectually dishonest.

He then proceeds to deny an NSFW video he sent showing a man allegedly getting head on YouTube, however you could only see his facial reaction, as well as an NSFW gif he posted of another man.

Mugen had also reposted a message of Parlo [gromjomlomtom] stating if he remembers when Nathorix would brag in sexual detail the benefits of taking hormones such as estrogen, to him and others who were minors.

1ik is seen corroborating that this took place.

When confronted by Parlo in February 2025 as mentioned earlier, Nathorix had also admitted to moaning in calls with Parlo and other minors, while he was 16 all the way to when he was 17 years of age. Old Discord logs from an older Roblox YouTuber Discord server show users discussing how Nathorix was moaning during different instances in early January 2022.

Roblox YouTuber MangoPool attests that Nathorix had said very weird and inappropriate in calls with him and numerous other minors, this took place in Parlo's Roblox YouTuber Discord Server. 

An example of Parlo calling with Nathorix in RYC during 2023, when he was 17 and he was 22. Parlo felt comfortable enough to show his face and be open to Nathorix at this time rather than anyone else. This showed how Parlo had immense trust in Nathorix as an older figure they could rely on during this time and was oftentimes open with them especially with personal information.

Nathorix admitted that what they did was degenerate however attempted to play it off as a ‘meme’ and ‘joke’. She has a pattern of utilising this excuse with other minors she acted inappropriately around.

Nathorix was further seen admitting that they sent and made sexual jokes that they ‘shouldn’t have’.

Nathorix then sarcastically apologised for complimenting Parlo, isolating Parlo from others due to their manipulation and attempted to make the point that he stated for Parlo to ‘stop defending me at any time’, which has been backed up with no evidence.

Nathorix is also seen adamantly denying that they groomed Parlo.

Nathorix in early January 2022 was also proven to have posted NSFW content in a group chat containing numerous minors such as Parlo who was 16.

Nathorix admitted to doing this, attempting to excuse her actions by claiming that since two 13-14 year olds were posting the NSFW gif, she reposted it to ‘get back at them’, while she was a 21 year old adult, responsible for her own actions.

Nathorix [under the alias ‘Femboy’] was also seen in the Roblox YouTuber Discord server in January 2022, posting a screenshot of her computer files, to which she had shown once again the uncensored NSFW gif. She had also shown a file called ‘raxts ass’ which was in reference to a sexualised image a controversial RTC user named raxts has posted from when she was apparently 15. Parlo was present at this time and was 16.

Nathorix also openly admitted on Twitter, to have accepted Parlo as a follower into her NSFW lewds account which she operated in late 2022 - early 2023, when Parlo was 17 and she was 22. Nathorix verbatim stated; ‘we were both laughing when revealing you got accepted’, establishing how she actively knew Parlo had access to her account.

This was the obvious troll account Parlo used to access her account and which was accepted. Nathorix claimed he ‘spam requested it with 8 different accounts’, which was completely untrue and lacks any evidence.

Nathorix had also allowed a 15 year old YouTuber at the time named Redlion, access her account, as he was seen following it.

[Images are cropped for privacy reasons and due to layout issues from Internet Archive].

Nathorix was seen on May 10th 2023, 8 days after Parlo turned 18, commenting suggestive gifs under a sexualised image of Parlo with his thighs.

Perhaps most unusually, Nathorix agreed to meet up with Parlo at 3AM UK time in December 2022, while she was 22 years old and Parlo was 17.

https://youtu.be/zhm9SbvPNNw?si=Mt8bNFBJoWXbWfkt

Nathorix had streamed the last couple of minutes of their meetup before Parlo’s dad intervened and drove him away.

Nathorix was seen admitting to attempting to offer Parlo drugs and weed while he was underaged. He excused this by claiming that she was trying to ‘be nice’. Nathorix also tried to belittle the age gap dynamic between them by sarcastically coining Parlo as ‘a 17 year old child’ to try and make it appear that he was infantilizing himself, and that a 17 year old cannot possibly be taken advantage of by someone who is 5 years older than themselves or be manipulated.

There is no sign of Nathorix actually taking accountability for their past actions whatsoever, they seek to only undermine the severity of their actions and play it off as a non-serious joke.

Nathorix was seen in the stream smoking the marijuana they had offered earlier.

Nathorix was seen attempting to emotionally manipulate and suicide bait Parlo on April 11th 2023, while he was still 17. He attempts to victimise himself and talk in depressing detail about wanting to take their own life to Parlo, who was clearly stressed and panicking in response.

Nathorix was born on June 15th 2000. Parlo was born on May 2nd 2005. Between them, there was an almost 5 year age gap present. [4 years 10 months].

Parlo | Wikitubia | Fandom 

Nattie Forsyth | Wikitubia | Fandom 

Parlo’s age was public information and present on his Twitter account as clearly seen from archived screenshots taken in January 2022. Nathorix has also never made the claim that he didn’t know Parlo’s age. It was known he was a minor [16 at the time].

Nathorix had admitted in a separate instance in early 2024, that they made inappropriate jokes around Parlo and had ‘very edgy humour’, that ended up rubbing off on him, causing him to be hypersexual in the process. 

Nathorix is seen admitting they ‘often feel guilty’ about what they did.

Keep in mind, a lot of evidence regarding Nathorix being inappropriate with Parlo has been lost to time, Parlo’s old discord accounts where Nathorix would send him NSFW content have been long terminated and he did not record calls where Nathorix would act inappropriately in, as at the time there was a golden rule not to record people or leak dms.

Parlo did not realise that he was taken advantage of until years later, and was extremely conflicted about it, consistently going back to Nathorix to get their side and to vent to them about personal situations, often being victim blamed for it in the process because he didn’t know who was in the right or wrong.

Nathorix meanwhile would take advantage of Parlo being conflicted by manipulating him, lying to him and collecting blackmail against him to use at a later basis against him.

When irrefutable evidence was discovered against Nathorix and they had no legitimate response to their allegations on call, Parlo eventually came to terms with the fact that his actions were inexcusable, and drew parallels from how Nathorix acted with other minors, to how he acted with him.

Parlo has also attested in an old separate document that Nathorix had sent them NSFW of a man engaging in intercourse which managed to get by YouTube’s moderation.

Ruben Sim was seen stating on January 31st 2026, that Parlo was actively being groomed by Nathorix into wanting gender reassignment surgery, this took place in late 2022 / early 2023.

Nathorix Manipulating Parlo

Nathorix was seen stating in 2024, that he was being used by Schlep, calling him a ‘pawn’, attempting to pivot Parlo to his side, and manipulate him in the process.

Nathorix’s ultimate goal was to get revenge on Schlep and to ruin his image / go forward with litigation against him. If he could convince Parlo to go against Schlep, Nathorix believed he could leverage Parlo’s platform to tank Schlep’s reputation.

After Parlo’s drama in November 2025, Nathorix attempted to reach out to Parlo again and rekindle a relationship [friendship] between the two. He was seen stating that he ‘cares a lot about him’, and that ‘he can do this and so much more’.

After regaining contact with Parlo, Nathorix immediately started instilling resentment in Parlo’s mind, stating that Schlep must have orchestrated the Dupe situation against him. Nathorix also stated that Schlep was posting more immediately after his [Parlo’s] removal from YouTube. Nathorix was also asking Parlo for information about what Schlep was planning on him, attempting to also try and get Parlo to admit he wasn’t groomed and that he was only manipulated into that idea by Schlep and GLC [GreenLegoCats].

Nathorix once again was seen stating that Schlep only used him for a tool, and that he wasn’t useful to him anymore. He also stated that both Gwamgo and Schlep were evil. These messages were sent on 20th November 2025.

Nathorix was manipulating Parlo at a time of intense emotional distress and trauma, after his sexual assault situation and channel deletion. Nathorix was using him for information to further his own revenge against Schlep, while pretending to care about Parlo.

Both Greenlegocats123 and Schlep stated that Nathorix lied to Parlo and manipulated him.

Greenlegocats123 was also seen making a Tweet calling out Nathorix for making ‘joke’ statements that he was grooming and conditioning Parlo, who was 17 at the time, into becoming transgender.

Nathorix was seen once again admitting to sending NSFW to Parlo when he was 17, yet lied about the timeline to make it look like he was ‘close to being 18’. Then she deflects by bringing up Parlo’s suicidality from when he was 16, and then attempts to defend Potemer, claiming that he was a victim.

During an unrelated situation that took place in Early 2025, Schlep had consulted Parlo and had stated that Nathorix verifiably groomed him and manipulated him.

Nathorix Aiding in Spreading Revenge Porn

In 2024, while Parlo was still being subjected to Nathorix’s victimisation tactics and manipulation coming off of numerous years of active grooming, Parlo had felt comfortable enough to confide in Nathorix about aspects of their sexual life and had sent sexual content they had filmed with an 18 year old friend while they were 19. This was posted to Nathorix in August 2024. [6 months before Feb 2025]

Nathorix’s statement to Parlo in February 2025, when they were confronted about disseminating sexual and intimate content of Parlo to  others without Parlo’s consent, to harass and intimidate him. This will be discussed later, Nathorix claims his close friend Mr R had operated the accounts which spread it publicly and used it to harass Parlo. 

Nathorix is seen stating in leaked messages between him and Nyft, that Parlo had shared porn content of himself and another person which ‘definitely didn’t consent to it being distributed’, which is an unsubstantiated claim that would be proven to have been a LIE.  Nathorix then followed up by stating that he was planning to use the pornographic intimate video against Parlo as a form of blackmail, as ‘they knew he [Parlo] would target her in the future’, referring to Parlo eventually realising all the evidence of Nathorix engaging with multiple minors. Nathorix also is seen stating that he successfully scared off Parlo by threatening to ‘reveal all about him’ alluding to the revenge porn she has of him downloaded on her devices.

Nathorix was planning to blackmail Parlo into SILENCE with intimate content of him and despite Parlo having sent him the video and deleting it in 20 seconds, Nathorix had immediately downloaded the video onto her devices to use as future leverage to keep someone close to her quiet.

Shortly after this admission from Nathorix, an account called ‘Caliyen’ appeared, pretending to be a ‘concerned user’ who somehow has access to the pornographic video of Parlo. This account then started spreading the images to invoke stress on Parlo, while they started to lie claiming that a minor was involved in the content he posted to lull and bait him into interacting with them. They were trying to goad Parlo into an admission that the video contained him.

Nathorix would state and heavily allude to the Caliyen account NOT being operated by him, but instead his close friend Mr R.

Also if this ‘Caliyen’ person was somehow a completely different person to Nathorix or Mr R, the fact that they have access to this content means that Nathorix [who was the only person who had access to the video] must have spread it to other parties and disseminated the content which would be illegal as it was done without Parlo’s consent.

Caliyen [Alleged to be Mr R] is seen openly lying about the contents of the video, stating that it was both ‘revenge porn’ and also CSAM. Which is ironic considering the fact that they would then proceed to post cropped content of the video, meaning by their own statement, they are incriminating themselves by posting screenshots of CSAM.

Allegedly Mr R is then seen operating another burner account called ‘Yay Banana’, which was seen contacting associates of Parlo such as Gwamgo with ‘more information’ regarding this content. They had lied claiming this material was originally posted in Homotopia, to sidestep the fact that it was posted to ONLY Nathorix, meaning this user must have had contact with Nathorix to be supplied with the video [or screenshots of it]. Allegedly Mr R is then seen stating that they attempted to bait Parlo into a conversation where he admits he appeared in the content. They are further seen posting cropped screenshots of the intimate video to Gwamgo, further violating Parlo’s privacy and with this being REVENGE PORN.

Mr R who was ‘allegedly’ under this account according to Nathorix, is seen covering for the fact that Nathorix had originally shown them aspects of the content because she was the only one who has access to it, they instead state; ‘idk if anyone who got access to this video wants to be named, because like sharing it is kinda shady’.

Mr R is then seen contemplating and rationalising the idea of ‘blurring’ the nude parts of the video, which would not detract away from the fact that he would be disseminating revenge porn regardless.

Mr R is then seen lying to Gwamgo stating that the video was sent to people in Homotopia or that it was linked to Homotopia. This is untrue and was only said to take heat off Nathorix’s back as she was the only one who had access to this video, they needed to create a false alibi. 

The account was seen threatening to post the video using mental gymnastics to justify the dissemination of the content. They were also seen stating to Gwamgo in DMS that he had the full video, questioning whether to send it.

The account stated to Gwamgo; ‘Parlo blocks us whenever we bring it up’, essentially leaking that numerous people were behind the operation of these accounts. With them also stating they had made 5 accounts to engage in prolonged harassment.

The account is then seen projecting, claiming that Parlo is a creep and pervert, deflecting from their own pedophile allegations and engaging in dehumanising attempts to try and ruin Parlo’s character and spread lies about him to other creators.

Parlo was essentially being threatened and harassed by most likely Nathorix and their close friend Mr R, with revenge porn and lies, because Parlo had decided to come out about the grooming he experienced from Nathorix when they were 16-17 and he was 21-22.

More examples of harassment are provided, showing more accounts both Nathorix and Mr R allegedly operated. With these tweets they attempted to prove it was Parlo in the video by cross-referencing cropped images of his face from the video and his leaked / doxxed face images. To which they posted publicly. The names of the accounts were also made to further degrade Parlo.

The account denied being Nathorix, yet used the same talking points as them.

It had been obvious that Nathorix played a large role in this, as in their leaked DMS with Nyft, he stated that he needed to prove it was Parlo, because they only had the video, not proof Parlo had specifically sent it to them as it was removed quickly. They were seeking to get an admission.

After Parlo directly confronted Nathorix in a GC with other users in February 2025, he is seen partially now walking back his previous claim, now saying he only said it ‘could be’ revenge porn, which is a stark contrast to when he definitively claimed Parlo DID share it. Nathorix also has still failed to provide any evidence up until this point. 

Then he is seen stating that ‘You can take a guess…’ in reference to who actually ran the accounts harassing Parlo. To which he was alluding was Mr R, a close friend of his that he was well aware Parlo knew about.

He also claims that he does not have the video on hand and he only sent ‘one singular frame of Parlo’s face, censored’ 6 months ago to Mr R.

We know this to be a lie, because even if Mr R / Nathorix was bluffing to Gwamgo about having the full video, they still had NUMEROUS other frames of Parlo’s face along with the fact that Nathorix was unaware that Parlo had his DM’s with Nyft, where he is seen stating he had the entire video, but needed to prove it was Parlo present in it, to which allegedly Mr R started doing.

Of course it works in his best interest to claim he ‘did not instruct anyone to do this’. Regardless however, he sent cropped revenge porn images, including Parlo’s face, to his associate who also has predator allegations, and as a result, their associate allegedly went out to harass me and threaten me, which now makes them liable.

For clarification, Nathorix was seen in February 2025, stating that they sent the image[s] to Mr R 6 months ago. Meaning Parlo sent the NSFW content around August 2024 [around mid 2024] as stated earlier. This was while Parlo was still being manipulated and was conflicted about the entire situation and allegations pertaining to Nattie / Nathorix. When Parlo at this time was greatly questioning Nathorix’s intentions and past while slowly collecting evidence, Nathorix inversely started doing the same and trying to leverage anything they could. So they opted to blackmail me with porn behind my back.

I contacted the user who was in the video [PINK], and they confirmed that they did not care in the slightest and said that it was ‘chill’.

PINK once again affirmed that nothing which I did by sharing that content, bothered or affected them.

Therefore proving that what Parlo had posted was NOT revenge porn, it however, was a blatant attempt at Nathorix using blackmail against Parlo to scare him into silence with whatever he had at his disposal.

There is no need for her to have done this if he had nothing to hide. Best case scenario for Nathorix was that he used Mr R as a proxy to do this, and sat idly by as he was using these accounts to harass me, with the accounts all magically deactivating once I cracked on that it was him, so he was complicit. 

Worst case scenario, he helped facilitate these accounts and actively harassed Parlo along with them.

Black messages - Mr R

Green messages - Nathorix

Mr R asks Nathorix if there was any new information regarding Parlo since he ‘scared him’. Proving that he was attempting to threaten Parlo into silence. Nathorix states to Mr R that Parlo would still be making a video of him talking about what he did to him. Mr R advises to get the police involved despite the slew of crimes both of them have allegedly committed. Nathorix follows up by stating that Parlo would be addressing how he groomed him.

Mr R then suggests he goes to Parlo’s house and attacks him / physically intimidates him. The word is hard to discern considering the fact that Nathorix had censored it, as she sent these chats to Nyft. Nathorix was then seen stating that he was rationalising doing it.

He is then seen posting an image of himself attempting to get an Uber to Parlo’s house [showing his actual road] which would have cost him £414. This shows the insane lengths he and his associate Mr R would go to harass him, silence him and even threaten him.

Parlo stated in 2025; ‘This all put me under intense distress, made me feel sick and ashamed, and I am entirely regretful for having ever entrusted Nathorix in general. It was a degenerate and disgusting lapse of my character to have engaged with her in that way and I do take full accountability. Me having done this, does not now mean I ever defended her in regards to her predator allegations and does not detract from her long history of predatory actions towards me. Due to the situation I had described what transpired to Dupe’

[PINK] the other person involved in the intimate video with Parlo, was proven to have been 18 years old at the time of the content being taken in July 2024. Their birthday was on 5th June 2024.

Nathorix was seen mentioning the explicit video Parlo had sent to him in Mid August 2024. Proving that he was one of the only individuals who had access to the material. 

Schlep was seen stating to Parlo that he was both groomed and manipulated by Nathorix and that he could care less for how he behaved or what he did in respect to her.

Nathorix’s Allegations

As established via this document, Nathorix had a long and well documented history of grooming and emotional manipulation and had levied his ability to omit key context and belittle his own actions to get away with their allegations years after being outed.

Despite being originally called out by content creators such as EpikRika and GreenLegoCats123 in early 2019, Nathorix was given a second chance by the community and re-platformed by KonekoKitten in late 2019 under their new rebranded channel; ‘Scrimzox’. 

There has been history revisionism done to try to change the narrative and sweep the fact that Nathorix was allowed to come back under a new alias. Many YouTuber’s at the time actively knew this and allowed it to take place regardless.

 Greenlegocats123 had even made a tweet voicing why so many members of the Roblox community reaccepted Nathorix and   started befriending them again, after the claims that were levied against him at the time. 

[https://x.com/greenlegocats/status/1151994915741548544?s=20]

This will be important to address for later, the serious claims known from 2019 - 2023 were;

The Craze [12 year old] situation.

The Chloegames Drama [NSFW posting].

The ImSandra Situation.

The Sewing video situation. 

The Sinny Situation [The Nudes].

The other situations Greenlegocats listed were completely menial and inconsequential compared to the predator accusations.

[https://x.com/greenlegocats/status/1151951406309396480?s=20]

Now despite Greenlegocats123 initially calling out Nathorix for their degenerative behaviour throughout 2019 and having made a tweet complaining about Nathorix should being assimilated into the Roblox Community again, 14 months later he had made a video [Sep 7th 2020] now spreading awareness that his Scrimzox channel was hacked and stated that it was unfortunate that people were attempting to justify it since Nathorix had ‘said and done stupid stuff’ in the past.

So even in 2020 following the initial accusations a year prior, many large players and commentary channels in the community softly started to change their stance and played down his behaviour reducing it from ‘predatory and criminal actions’, to ‘stupid stuff’.

                KreekCraft was also seen publicly thanking Nathorix [Scrimzox] for the information he presented to him.

[https://x.com/KreekCraft/status/1230287744624201728?s=20]

Nathorix had also attested in private calls that KreekCraft was allegedly in contact with them in private in 2020, this remains unproven.

KreekCraft was also seen publicly still interacting with Nathorix on numerous occasions months after her initial allegations were made public. KreekCraft was also seen on December 16th 2019 attempting to help Nathorix with recovering their channel since they were locked out of it.

This is not a call-out to the numerous large YouTubers who interacted with Nathorix after the 2019 exposal, far from it. This is proof however, that Nathorix was accepted back into the Roblox Community and was allowed to thrive years later until their cancellation in 2023 due to their comprehensive history of lying, omitting key details and warping the narrative.

Popular Roblox YouTuber Flamingo [AlbertsStuff], had also interacted with Nathorix numerous times publicly months after their early 2019 allegations. Nathorix had also made the claim that they had private contact with Flamingo, however this remains an unproven claim.

[https://x.com/AlbertsStuff/status/1186575170137255936?s=20]

[https://x.com/AlbertsStuff/status/1207164712095559681?s=20]

Ruben Sim, had also been actively manipulated by Nathorix, with them omitting context behind large claims made against them. Ruben had actively associated with Nathorix for numerous years following their initial 2019 exposal and even publicly defended them. This was until more information was uncovered and Ruben severed ties in 2023/24.

The idea that it was solely Parlo who associated with Nathorix is completely false and a disingenuous lie, it would be even more bad faith to then selectively obfuscate the years long build up of emotional manipulation, coddling and grooming that Parlo experienced and that numerous large Roblox YouTubers and witnesses can attest to.

The manipulation, and trust that was built up during the years-long grooming process was a large contributing factor to why Parlo had consistently gone back to Nathorix to verify pre-existing claims that were made, to get her side of the story and to open up and vent about their own personal problems in which put them in a vulnerable position. Nathorix had utilised numerous excuses to try and dodge facing accountability for the numerous claims against her, and this all will be touched upon in this segment.

The claims presented originally in early 2019, by creators such as Greenlegocats123 [April 27th 2019] and EpikRika [Jan 7th 2019], remained the outstanding claims against Nathorix until new allegations were unearthed in late 2023 by Greenlegocats123. Parlo would then do a large amount of research into Nathorix’s actions between 2024 and 2025, looking through archives and contacting other new victims in the process which has accumulated in the information that has been gathered in this document.

Nathorix was able to garner tens of thousands of subscribers per month in Summer 2020, with him uploading numerous videos per day garnering hundreds of thousands of views. At the time, he was once again one of the largest Roblox commentary channels, only behind KonekoKitten and Greenlegocats123.

Scrimzox - YouTube 

                                                Scrimzox's YouTube Stats (Summary Profile) - Social Blade Stats 

Nathorix was seen amassing over 38,000 subscribers in August 2020 alone, while getting millions of views a month. Large Roblox YouTuber’s and the greater community allowed him to remain on the platform.

Parlo's Stance on Nathorix

Self Harm Situation

Trigger warning; Suicide, trauma, domestic abuse, self harm

In 2022 when Parlo was 16, he was experiencing severe mental health issues and consistent suicidal, self-destructive mental breakdowns. The triggers that set this off were constant online harassment, domestic abuse, family separation issues and fear of abandonment.

In June 2026, Parlo had spoken directly to a psychiatrist and they believe he may be suffering from EUPD [emotionally unstable personality disorder also known as borderline personality disorder]. This has been specified for background context.

What was discussed was Parlo’s mental trauma from when he was 16 in 2022, which has continued since. 

It is specified that Parlo scored 8/10 on MacLean screening instruments for BPD. This is not a definitive diagnosis but it means someone may likely have it.

Personal information is redacted due to sensitivity.

In Late 2021 / Early 2022, Parlo had been domestically abused by his father. This was both verbal and physical, with him being physically dragged across tables and fought on the ground paired with insults and verbal attacks. This was triggered by his fathers alcohol problems and has been long documented with video and audio recordings which have remained private. These recordings were shown to a counselor. His fathers behaviour had continued into 2024/25 with many recordings still being in his possession. GreenLegoCats has seen some private recordings. 

Many people have tried to claim this to be overexaggerated and false, acting as if they have any idea of the problems that happened behind closed doors. People have also callously attempted to disregard this information claiming it to be unnecessary, despite it offering as crucial context to the lead up of Parlo’s SH incident.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220127000043/https://twitter.com/gamingparlo/status/1486488796405407752 

An archived tweet Parlo had made [26th Jan 2022], detailing an example where his father had shut down the Wi-Fi connection and tried to take his phone and force his way into his room, threatening his online mutuals in the process.

Archived screenshots from 2021/22 of Parlo talking about the domestic abuse his father inflicted on him in a Roblox YouTuber Discord server with Olix.

Parlo describes his father attempting to pull his arm back and dislocate it along with pushing Parlo to a breakdown where he cried. Parlo also states how his father verbally abused him calling him a predator when he was under the influence of alcohol.

Parlo was seen expressing his suicidality in RYC [Roblox Discord server] in November 2021, when his entire channel was demonetized as he was using TTS at the time.

Parlo was seen once again being under mental distress in his public discord server chat in December 2021.

Archived tweets in which Parlo had posted between 8th March to the 9th, show him publicly expressing how bad of a mental state he was in, touching on topics to do with his anxiety attacks, eating disorders and sleeping problems.

Parlo had also voiced how disgusted he was that many people online would mock him being domestically abused [LEFT], with others claiming that he is faking the domestic abuse situation for empathy and is pretending to be depressed for attention [RIGHT]. Parlo stated how it was people like this, who maliciously lied about his mental health, that pushed him on the verge of having a mental breakdown.

With Parlo’s trauma and mental health issues building up over time, it eventually resulted in him self harming in early March 2022 as a form of catharsis.

In the following day on the 10th March, Parlo released a tweet expressing his suicidality as well as how he had been self harming for numerous days.

Parlo on the 11/12th March then released a notice on his public Twitter account stating how he had attempted suicide in his conservatory going into detail about his trauma.

Topics discussed; Suicide, trauma, self h-rm

Parlo opens up about the self harm situation describing his mentality at the time and what led up to his breakdown. Parlo states that he vented a lot to mutuals and had posted his self harm to people in private as a call for help as he had no one to speak or open up to about his trauma in his personal life. He also profusely apologised to those affected. He makes it clear that while his thought process was impaired and he was undergoing self-destructive behaviour, that is not an excuse for what he did.

Kirb / Blaster / Dial / Kormanx

Kirb, a user who was around 13 at the time was one of the main people who saw Parlo’s suicidal traumatic mental breakdowns and mentioned to users how it was triggering to see Parlo deteriorate on calls.

Parlo was seen apologising and taking accountability over his actions to Kirb during 2023, 2024 and 2025. Kirb in 2024 states it was fine but he wasn’t appreciative of Parlo making Dial look bad, who was the individual who called the Police on Parlo, to which they kicked the door in and took him to the hospital for a week. Parlo affirms that he apologised to Dial for the way he acted.

In 2025, Parlo had also once again reached out to Kirb to reaffirm how sorry he was for what he did out of guilt for his past actions and the way he conducted himself.

Kirb was seen empathising with Parlo’s past position and that he does feel bad for what he went through. Kirb also attests that Parlo never did anything harmful to him although he was affected by the self harm images that were posted.

Kirb makes it clear that this did happen years ago however and that he has forgiven Parlo.

Parlo was seen apologising for having been a degenerate towards his mutuals in open spaces and environments where others including him may have seen.

 Kirb attests that Parlo never groomed him, manipulated him, solicited him or abused him and accepted Parlo’s apology. Kirb was also seen stating that he was secretive about his age and he was ‘positively sure’ that Parlo was not fully aware of his age at the time.

These claims were relitigated against Parlo once again in a large Google Document created by a user named 77, who had used AI programs such as ChatGPT to format his document and maliciously twist numerous situations. 

A document has been provided which debunks his initial claims and details numerous examples of his doxxing, lies and harassment.

In screenshots provided by 77 where he had interviewed Kirb, he was attempting to push the minor into recounting the triggering situation despite him making it clear in response that Parlo apologised and that he doesn’t believe it matters anymore to revitalising the claims as it happened years ago. Kirb also makes it clear that Parlo had sent the images of his self harm to individuals to prove he was not faking his mental trauma, which was a prevalent claim which was being made at the time, this does not serve as an excuse however acts as context.

Kirb was seen expressing his anger towards 77 and how he interrogated him for information in regards to a triggering and personal situation in regards to him. Keep in mind Kirb at this time was 15/16. Kirb also confirms that 77 had not asked the minor for permission before leaking all their messages publicly.

Kirb voices his disagreement with 77’s callous claim that Parlo self harming was an act of sympathy baiting considering he was a suicidal minor at the time dealing with severe trauma and depression. 

Kirb also expressed how weird he felt around 77’s interrogative questions.

Kirb was seen inviting another person to the GC being Blaster, someone who was involved with the situation when it transpired in 2022. He was seen voicing his anger towards how 77 was bringing the situation back up 3 years later while also harassing Frevv [a friend of his] in the process. Blaster also expressed how he wanted to defend Parlo and didn’t want this all to be blown out of proportion.

This conversation exchange shows that both Parlo and Blaster are on good terms and have moved on amicably from the situation that happened in 2022.

Kirb and Parlo then called where Parlo once again took accountability for the situation and apologised for the way he conducted himself around him in the past.

77 in response had publicly attempted to brush off the fact that he interrogated a minor about a triggering situation that happened with them 3 years prior and made them relive the situation, brushed off the fact that both parties had already regained contact privately and Parlo apologised, as well as then leaking the minors messages in a document that was filled with misinformation.

77 was seen stating that the minor’s ‘commentary was never the focus of the document’, ‘nor was their interpretation presented as fact’. This is an example of him attempting to retroactively neutralise and belittle the minor's side of events after they have expressed their anger at him for unprofessionally handling the situation and maliciously relitigating years long trauma for their own self-benefit.

Kormanx in 2025 also gave his entire side of the situation, affirming that many people believed that Parlo was suicide baiting and faking his mental health issues for attention and so Parlo felt the need to share what took place with many people as a call for help, however this should not have been done. He also covers how Parlo’s judgement was impaired due to his self-destructive behaviour at the time so he didn’t process the consequences of his actions.

He also highlights that labeling Parlo as an abuser for this situation is completely untrue and that many of the people involved with what took place simply wish to move on and wish that Parlo would improve on his mental health.

Kirb had also contacted Dial [old username being Clyde], the person who originally called the Police on Parlo after he made it public that he had attempted suicide. 

Parlo initially was extremely angry at Dial for knowing his personal information [Parlo was not doxxed yet], as he apparently collected his IP from a Minecraft game they hosted, as well as due to Dial’s report, the police kicking down the door and sending him to hospital for a week. 

Parlo found this all to be a massive violation of his privacy at the time.

However as seen by Dial’s messages, Parlo had contacted him in private and discussed the situation in depth years later and apologised to which they both mutually moved on from.

In this conversation excerpt between both Parlo and Dial in 2025, Dial was seen explaining that the proof used by 77 and his associates against Parlo [will be covered later] which involved cropped and stitched discord group chat archives was also not chronologically laid out, which further affected the credibility of the evidence.

Parlo was also seen stating that he would make an apology to Dial.

When the police had arrived after Dial [Clyde] made the initial report, they had kicked the door off its lock and broke the door frame, this terrified Parlo who was panicking at the time, as his personal information at this point was not known and this was the first example of police intervention at his address. Parlo viewed this as a massive violation of his privacy and had angrily made emotionally charged statements on his Discord announcements.

Parlo was under the idea that someone [he later realised to be Dial], must have had his personal information in order to have made this report in the first place.

Parlo was seen posting an image of him in hospital shortly after he was taken by police. This situation was covered more extensively in his video on the situation.

Parlo had also apologised to Pyndrex who was personally involved in the ordeal and they amicably moved on from what took place.

Parlo was seen directly apologising to Kirb for what transpired and as shown in an archive of his 2025 Response, Kirb acknowledges his apology and criticises other people for attempting to reignite the situation.

Schlep

For context, Parlo and Schlep have been in longtime contact with each other for years, since early 2023. However relations became strained over time with situations such as the Homotopia incident and the Dupe allegations emerging which concerned Schlep since the full context had not been presented and the situations were poorly responded to at the time.

Following the GoFundMe / Wolfgang Situation during Nov 2025, this marked an official severing of ties between Schlep and Parlo due to it being reputationally damaging to continue to associate with Parlo during this time due to mounting claims. 

Parlo had released a 3 hour long response video addressing all the claims against him on January 31st 2026, to which prompted 1ik, Ruben Sim and Schlep to join the live chat. What followed was a back and forth between the parties, where hostile claims were exchanged.

Following the termination of his secondary account and making him once again unable to have a public response remain up, Parlo had grown extremely angry at Schlep, believing him to have had a part in both of his channel terminations. Private information had also come out at the same time detailing allegations to do with MiniToon which Schlep was looking into. 

On 17th February 2026 Parlo had then released a Google Document attempting to call Schlep out for his alleged association to / defense of AceTheNarrator [his past narrator], MiniToon [creator of Piggy] and RVVZ [owner of Criminality].

The situation for the most part died down beyond this point, however the situation was reignited on 31st March 2026, when Schlep having made a tweet that many people including Dupe himself saw as disingenuous, as he stated that Parlo dated a 12 year old [Deleted Tweet], with no further context on how the person had lied about their age for an extensive period of time.

In response Parlo had released another Google Document during Schlep’s public back and forth with the highly controversial user ChibiReviews, attempting to solely call him out for his association to AceTheNarrator [his past narrator].

In this document he had used serious definitive claims towards both MiniToon and RVVZ to which he had since retracted [1] due to the situations allegedly happening when they were minors and the claims used being definitionally wrong.

While Parlo had not directly slandered any individual mentioned as he believed the claims he was making, he has since taken accountability for spreading misinformation upon understanding the legal ramifications of the statements he made. In order to prove slander, you need to have evidence at your disposal that the person knew the claims they were making were demonstrably false and caused financial or reputational damages.

The claims against AceTheNarrator however were not false, as he had a long documented history of degenerate behaviour with numerous online users with him having a brief sexual relationship with an 11 year old when he was 14 turning 15. AceTheNarrator also possessed and distributed CSAM.

Parlo however, had incorrectly covered Schlep’s association with AceTheNarrator believing he was complicit and that they were still friends. This was not true and upon consulting in a private call, Schlep and Parlo sorted out the situation with Parlo updating his document retracting the claims.

 Parlo and Schlep as of currently are on good speaking terms.

Parlo - ‘I made a massive mistake ever consulting Nathorix in regards to the Schlep drama and I understand how awful it made me look. It was never an advocacy of any of their behaviour and it certainly did not mean I respected them, it was genuinely just me being blinded by petty revenge online and since then I have never and will never engage with them again. I have apologised to Schlep in private about this and promised to never do it again.’

Parlo’s retraction statements to RVVZ and MiniToon for his past claims.

Schlep personally saw many examples of Nathorix manipulating Parlo and saying unhinged statements about him.

Parlo and Schlep are seen communicating about Parlo’s Public retraction in his Google Document affirming that Schlep did not continue to associate nor defend AceTheNarrator after his worse actions came to light.

Defender / UTTP Situation

Defender was a 15/16 year old, known UTTP higher-up who Parlo had associated with from late 2023 - July 2025. Parlo had relied on Defender for information against other UTTP higher-ups [such as Glen, FPS, Anime Sucks]. Defender had provided confidential information, evidence of crimes and leaked future plans of the UTTP to raid certain victims [such as TADC]. 

Defender had also provided evidence of him making FBI reports against predatory UTTP members however attempted to maintain a veil of secrecy as he was afraid of repercussions. 

In July 2025, a document was made by a known cybercriminal, doxxer, pedophilic UTTP member named FPS in which attempted to claim Parlo was complicit in Defender’s crimes. These claims were also parroted by 77, a known habitual liar and stalker whose actions have been covered in this document.

This segment of the document will provide the full context, proving that Defender lied to, gaslight and manipulated Parlo and concealed his criminal acts. It will also prove that Defender threatened to dox Parlo in private and attempted to use him. It also proves that Parlo was NOT complicit in the swatting of Potemer or the facilitation of the Potemerfall server. 

This will also prove that Parlo had nothing to do with the HairyTwinkle harassment situation, despite a myriad of lies made by 77 and other users. It will also prove that Parlo’s private association / collaborative action with Defender did NOT affect the Potemer situation according to Potemer’s OWN MOTHER.

Numerous leaked calls from August 2025 have been provided in this document between Parlo and Defender. Defender did not know he was being recorded. These videos prove Defender’s malicious intentions, with him admitting Parlo’s innocence in many situations.

RECORING EXCERPTS FROM 4TH AUGUST 2025

Defender admits on call to lying publicly about not being an FBI informant, despite the fact that he did file reports and provide information to law enforcement.

Defender states, ‘You see how I can’t admit that right or I’d be fucked’. Proving that what Parlo said was true, Defender did make FBI reports and provided compromising and private information against the highest members of the UTTP. This does NOT exonerate him of any wrongdoings however.

Parlo states that no one had any evidence at the time of Defender’s actual age, however affirms that he now knows he is 16, Defender denies this.

Parlo confronts Defender over the SH situation, where Defender got unknown individuals to self harm. Defender affirms that he went a ‘little too far’ with that. Parlo states how Defender would manipulate the narrative when it was brought up in the past [2023/24] stating the people were predators, Defender replies affirming this and that they were adults with ‘the youngest being 19’. 

There is no way to disprove this claim however keep in mind that Defender has a history of lying and manipulation as presented in this document, so take his claim with a pinch of salt.

Parlo states that he wouldn’t classify Defender as a predator for his actions, as the SH situation took place when he was 14 and the Ikea situation took place when he was around 15. However Parlo expressed his disgust in Defender’s alleged actions especially in regards to Ikea as it was still highly immoral and illegal, IF the claim was true. Defender responds by stating; ‘It’s not true at all and we know it’s not true’. 

Defender then casts doubt on the evidence by claiming that since AnimeSucks was the one who was mainly spreading the claims, it must have been fake as he has lied about individuals and forged evidence before.

Parlo states to Defender that many members of the UTTP already know he was feeding information to the FBI. Defender states ‘not Glen though’, admitting that he once again, did funnel information against the UTTP to law enforcement. 

Parlo responds stating that ‘just because Glen doesn’t believe it, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen’, to which Defender replies;

 ‘It did happen, I just need him not to know it’.

RECORING EXCERPTS FROM 6TH AUGUST 2025

This call perfectly shows Defender’s flagrant manipulation.

Defender is heard pressuring Parlo and threatening to blackmail him to prevent him from making a video going over the Ikea situation and calling it out.

Defender is heard laughing sadistically threatening Parlo and boasting that the UTTP have returned and that CSAM bots have been affecting YouTube again.

Defender attempts to lie and claim that he is 18 and that his age is also ‘negative 2’, which was a recurring joke he would make to conceal his personal information due to ‘OPSEC reasons’.

Defender claims he cannot remember if he runs the ‘CliffJumper’ alternate account, despite Parlo being very sceptical. The CliffJumper account was an alt Defender allegedly operated to share CSAM material of a user named Ikea.

Parlo recommends Defender to actually respond to the claims if he is innocent. Defender maintains the fact that he is innocent despite Parlo's growing concern. Defender then uses plausible deniability and argues that he 'forgot even if he owns the account'.

Parlo discusses the HairyTwinkle situation with Defender and states how disgusting it was.

 Defender does not disagree when Parlo stated in call that he was not complicit with the harassment that HairyTwinkle was subjected to by him and Cara.

[0:49] Parlo then brings up how Defender obviously attempts to play both sides to benefit himself, to which Defender then subtly threatens Parlo at [1:14] by claiming  'if I REALLY wanted to fuck with you, I could'.

Parlo affirms that he did not know the full extent of Defender's egregious actions and that the only situations he entirely knew about were the examples where Defender doxxed someone who made a video critical of Parlo, to which he did all on his own volition. Defender does not deny this.

Parlo also criticises Defender for his affiliation in UTTP servers which contain known cybercriminals such as Glen, to which Defender claims he was only in the servers to 'spy on them'.

Parlo asks Defender if he would be scared if the UTTP knew he was actively feeding information against them to the FBI and law enforcement. Defender then presses Parlo on if he is 'threatening him' with this compromising information due to him being extremely paranoid. Defender then later admits if his admissions of gathering information to the FBI was ever made public, he would just lie claiming Parlo was being dishonest.

Defender admits to wanting to extort Parlo with private information and dox him. Defender also admits to uploading a replica of his house on Roblox twice and that he would not take the games down. 

Defender also pressures Parlo once again into not calling him out or being ‘too harsh’ in his upcoming video on him or he would be angry.

Defender [Sentinel] was seen messaging Gwamgo asking to get in contact with Parlo immediately for blackmail reasons. If Gwamgo refused, Defender claimed he would dox him and his family, and shadow ban his channel similar to what he did with ‘Parlo’s new channel'.

On 27th May 2026 [the same day as the previous message], Defender was seen messaging both Gwamgo and Parlo asking why they are so quiet. He then attempts to blackmail them into engaging with him or he would ‘get AntiTroll to leak more recordings’. Defender then stated he could simply go to Parlo’s A-loggers and lie claiming he has been consistently working with Parlo.

Defender made it known he was stalking and monitoring what Parlo had been stating about him in different discord servers and has shown his willingness to lie.

Parlo was seen asking Gwamgo on 8th July 2025, how he can cut Defender off without the risk of being harassed, attacked or doxxed. He also asked for Gwamgo’s help and if he can voice to the public that Defender is attempting to blackmail him with his private information and that he feels like he ‘can’t do shit’.  Gwamgo later purged his messages in January 2026 as he was temporarily banned due to his old messages being flagged.

Parlo was seen messaging Cara [Deleted User] where she admitted Defender forced her to do many degenerate actions to which Parlo responds by stating that he feels like he needs to keep Defender close because if he decides to cut him off, he may face serious repercussions of doxxing and blackmail.

FBI associations

Many users online have attempted to cast doubt on Defender’s information and evidence sharing to the FBI, for valid reasons. There was no proof released up until now of Defender admitting to having done this, so people believed it was a cheap, unfounded excuse.

However, Defender had openly shared FBI reports he was drafting, as well as informing Gwamgo and Parlo along with other mutuals in private, that he was in direct contact with FBI operatives. Defender had openly for a long period of time, been feeding private identifiable information of top UTTP members such as Glen, FPS and Miami who had committed a myriad of crimes, to Parlo and allegedly law enforcement and was actively trying to compromise them behind their back.

Defender mentions in a discord group chat containing Parlo and his close associates, that the FBI has finally contacted him after the reports he drafted. Parlo was also inactive for a period of time around early May 2025, and Defender was asking for where he was as the FBI may want to consult him for more information, as at the time Parlo’s videos were the only examples of media compiling UTTP cybercrimes.

It was open knowledge that Parlo’s videos were being used as evidence compilation for the FBI in early 2025, Parlo had shown screenshots of users drafting FBI reports and contacting them showing his video to them. FPS was seen even stating that the FBI had confronted him about what SkibidiFarms was, most likely due to knowledge they gained from Parlo’s video which documented the situation at the time. The information collected by Parlo to make these videos was oftentimes funneled in by Defender who was working inside circles to gather information against high ranking members. This however does not absolve Defender of his own crimes which would later be made clear.

SkibidiFarm members were also seen asking other users if they were personally fedded by law enforcement officers after the release of Parlo’s newest video. Proving that his videos specifically resulted in legal intervention and more attention being brought onto the UTTP’s illicit actions.

Parlo had also shown screenshots of an anonymous user's FBI report in which they sourced the information gathered from his videos.

Defender was seen stating that he is certain it was his own detailed report that led to FPS getting ‘fedded’ and arrested. He stated how he provided Parlo’s video as evidence, which matches with what FPS had stated on KiwiFarms. Defender follows up by providing more secretive information on what Glen is attempting to do, now that his mules are being compromised. This is due to Glen often using other people to do his dirty work, however Defender claimed to have been taking them down one by one.

Defender provides more information and warns that Glen wants CSAM bots on YouTube to continue. He also shares the general location of where he believes FPS to be.

Defender was seen further talking about both Miami and FPS being fedded by law enforcement admitting that he contacted the FBI about UTTP leaders they need to remove. Defender also further clarifies that he provided crucial information to the FBI once again.

Proof has been provided proving that Deleted User was in fact Defender. Old discord messages show Parlo referring to the account as Defender, with the Deleted User account also posting screenshots from their end showing their account used to be called Defender.

More examples of Defender making it clear that he was attempting to contact the FBI are made clear in private DMS between both him and Parlo. These admissions were made BEFORE his statements in the Pyrocynical Group Chat. This corroborates the fact that these aren’t just miscellaneous statements, it proves that Defender did actively try and report the individuals he pretended to be close associates with, to the FBI and collected evidence against them. This doesn’t vindicate him of his actions, however it does prove what Parlo said to be true, that he did regularly inform the FBI.

Defender was seen stating that he was having trouble trying to call back the FBI and to contact them again. He also confirms he has numerous direct lines of communication with the FBI, he has both engaged with them on call, and has emailed them.

It was examples of this that made Parlo feel conflicted about Defender’s intentions, he seemed to be the only person with a very high position involved in the UTTP, that was willing to whistle-blow vital information and attempt to get other high ranking members arrested.

Adding on to Parlo’s conflicted stance on Defender, he was getting agitated that what Defender predicted in regards to the UTTP potentially spam reporting Parlo’s channel, coincidentally ended up happening. Parlo started to wonder if Defender was privately instigating this all and potentially playing both sides.

Defender affirmed that he was not aiding the UTTP as he had openly gone out of his own way to provide information to the FBI putting his own safety at risk.

Parlo remained sceptical suggesting that Defender could have been waging his FBI connection as a potential defense while actually playing for both sides. Parlo also brings up his problems with Defender still being mutuals and friends with these individuals even if he is providing information against them. Parlo also highlights that Defender adding him to GCs with other UTTP members makes him uneasy and disgusted, proving that he wanted no active association with any UTTP members.

Defender remains adamant that he is simply aiding Parlo and that he would never conspire against him in private. Defender claims that he remains close with the problematic individuals to gain their trust and to compromise them eventually. Defender also adds that if was actually against Parlo, he would not be warning him about serious things the UTTP were planning to do against him, which was a valid retort at the time.

Parlo had always been voicing to Defender, from August 2024 to even May 2025, on why he was still actively associating with these cybercriminals and disgusting individuals. Parlo never ‘swept it under the rug’, or turned a blind eye to it. It was something that always bothered him and made him disgusted. 

Defender’s response would always be that it was to keep tabs on them and warn individuals ahead of time who may be victimised by their actions, while he would also state he would try to secretly find their information. 

As stated earlier too, Defender admitted in a leaked call between him and Parlo, that he was an FBI informant.

 In FPS’ google document, he attempts to disprove the fact that Defender informed the FBI and whistleblower information to them, by contacting Defender upfront and asking him. Somehow FPS didn’t think that Defender would be incentivised to deny this claim since he didn’t want it to be leaked in the first place and if he did admit to this, it would put him in harm's way and he would most likely face reprisal for his actions. 

Since no evidence was released from Parlo at this time, it was easy for Defender to claim it was false.

FPS also attempts to lie claiming that he knows someone who is an actual FBI informant, with no evidence and despite the fact that a month prior to this document being created, he was arrested for CSAM.

As seen in these archived screenshots, Deleted User is proven to have been Defender. Defender was seen providing crucial information to Parlo, warning him about the list of individuals the UTTP would try to harass and attack ahead of time. Defender would provide screenshots, evidence and intel about what was being planned in private so Parlo could make it known in his videos.

He was a whistleblower

Defender acted as a whistleblower who provided Parlo and other users with vital information in regards to the UTTP and its higher-ups. The main reason for why Parlo maintained contact with Defender, was because of his ability to warn Parlo ahead of time what the UTTP were planning on him and his mutuals, as well as providing confidential information of what was happening in their closed circles.

AntiTroll’s [Deleted User] messages to Parlo giving more background information on the UTTP, he then follows up by urging Parlo to continue to speak to Defender as he ‘knows way more’ about the situation.

Defender was seen stating to Parlo not to use certain confidential recordings that he provided as UTTP members will realise that he is ‘not with them’. 

Defender expresses his dissatisfaction in how a division of the UTTP composed of members who despise Parlo is growing, and how the FBI was doing nothing to combat them at the time.

Defender was seen providing Parlo with in-depth explanations on how the UTTP would be operating and their plans including the list of targets, for Parlo to then call it out in his YouTube videos. These videos would archive the crimes of many users who associated themselves with the group, such as FPS, AnimeSucks, Miami [etc.]. Law enforcement also allegedly used the information provided in the videos for prosecution and arrests, since at the time in 2024, Parlo was one of the only creators directly calling out the group and compiling the proof.

Defender was seen giving forewarning that the UTTP would be attempting to go after Roblox YouTubers such as Ruben Sim and Schlep, as well as large Roblox game communities such as Forsaken.

Defender was seen providing evidence in May 2025, that the UTTP were targeting and harassing Ruben Sim on Twitter with accounts posting violatory content. Defender had also shared his concerns about a smaller content creator called Josher who made a video on the UTTP detailing their actions, stating that he could potentially be attacked and made a target, with him urging Parlo that they should contact him to give him forewarning.

It was instances like these that gave Parlo the impression that while Defender was a morally ambiguous person up until this point, his intel and drive for seemingly ‘doing the right thing’ made him a valuable contact.

Ikea Situation

The initial expose document created by FPS attempts to lie and push the false narrative that Parlo knew Defender had actively disseminated CSAM of a 16 year old named Ikea and ‘brushed it off’. This was NOT the case.

Parlo was seen on numerous occasions [2024], openly questioning Defender on an alleged screenshot that seemed to show him admitting to leaking potential CSAM. Defender had attempted to deny the validity of the screenshot by stating that it was inspect elemented, and that it originally came from ‘Anime Sucks’ or FPS who were known UTTP higher-ups who had forged false predator DMs of Parlo and KreekCraft. Defender also gaslight Parlo into believing the message was forged due to the profile picture being square, rather than circular meaning that it was ‘tampered’ with.

A week before the document made by FPS providing more evidence against Defender especially for the Ikea situation came out, Parlo was seen confronting Defender on June 23rd 2025 about how another high ranking UTTP member called Striker claimed that Defender was a predator and that they groomed a 16 year old named Ikea.

Parlo was concerned about the situation, especially with the fact that it would coincide with the cropped screenshot he had, which he had confronted Defender about before in 2024. Defender however responds by claiming that he is only being smeared due to the fact that Striker is ‘an FBI informant’. Most likely alluding to the fact that since Striker had CSAM of DD and swatted Parlo in 2024 as well as many others, he was ‘FEDDED by law enforcement’ and ‘compromised’ and therefore started providing information against other high ranking members in the process to give himself some good standing.

Current DMs between Parlo and Defender show that his account was terminated, this will be important to highlight later.

Presented are examples of forged discord messages between a UTTP com-girl and a user who is framed to be ‘KreekCraft’, these messages were fabricated by AnimeSucks and Miami. This corroborates the fact that Parlo was skeptical on the validity of the screenshot he had, as not only did it lack any substantial context, but it was only being spread by other vindictive UTTP higher-ups at the time, meaning that there was always a possibility of it being faked like their other attempts at spreading screenshots. 

Despite believing that there was a possibility of the message being real, no further messages were released to further contextualize what Defender was stating, so there was nothing to go off on. Furthermore the age of the person referenced in the screenshot was NOT known or definitively referenced.

Now upon the release of the expose document, in early July 2025, the full archived discord chat history was now provided, proving that Defender most likely lied the entire time, as the evidence was irrefutable. 

Parlo directly confronted Defender in private about the situation, however when he received a short message denying the validity of the messages along with Defender scrambling to pin all blame on other UTTP members without offering any counter evidence, Parlo immediately knew Defender was guilty.

However these messages prove that Defender would flat out lie and manipulate the narrative to cover his own actions.

While jokes at Defenders expense were made casually, especially in leaked calls about this situation, it was made under the idea that Defender was possibly guilty of such actions, however at the time a single out of context and cropped screenshot wasn’t enough to definitively prove guilt. The jokes, albeit tasteless, were made to push and prod Defender into an admission. Additionally judging by Defender’s lacklustre responses he would give and the fact that he grew more and more annoyed and agitated every time when confronted, it certainly didn’t paint him in a good light. Now when irrefutable chat message evidence was eventually provided, Parlo took action to confront him and call him privately to record him without his knowledge to collect evidence and potential admissions against him.

The document attempted to make a direct claim that Parlo knew without a doubt that the claims were true with no evidence, and later deleted this statement and retracted it. 

The document currently still up, has selectively removed the previous statement.

FPS then attempts to reference one of Parlo’s first UTTP expose videos from Early 2024 in which he calls out UTTP Emperor Anime Sucks for posting a YouTube video link of them scrolling through a Discord Group Chat called ‘Tadc raid’, that contained an explicit image of a male that was alleged to be 16. 

FPS then makes numerous baseless claims with no evidence to straw grasp and claim Parlo must have known about Defender’s complicity. He states that CliffJumper was Defender’s alt with no sufficient evidence and makes the argument that since the profile picture was censored, that means this is ‘suspicious’ alluding to possible private collusion between Defender and Parlo to conceal the situation. This is, despite Anime Sucks profile picture being censored too by Parlo in the video, as he was worried about any of the profile pictures containing anything that may violate YouTube’s TOS. Additionally FPS brings up how Defender owned the group chat so he must have known, despite the logs proving he wasn’t active in the chat while the image was posted so it wasn’t definitive at the time whether he knew, this was only circumstantial and subjective.

ABOVE is the screenshot Parlo had access to. It lacked any substantial context and appeared possibly tampered with at the time.

Keep in mind too, there is no proof that Ikea was 16 at the time. Much of the information has been lost to time and is unprovable. Ikea’s date of birth is not known.

AntiTroll was seen stating that FPS had finally provided the full Ikea chatlogs, proving that they were not available beforehand until July 2025.

Parlo in early 2025 in a leaked video recording from AntiTroll, was seen reposting the alleged screenshot as mentioned earlier, to try and goad Defender into talking more about the situation, since the context was still unknown at the time.

AntiTroll and Parlo were consistently seen bringing the situation back up and when Parlo had re-litigated the screenshot, AntiTroll was seen stating ‘classic’. AntiTroll however has attempted to retroactively claim that Parlo ‘knew the entire context’ about the situation and was belittling it, trivialising it and seeing it more as a joke then what it is, a crime, when that was not the case. Parlo believed the incident needed to be addressed and was pushing Defender into discussing it in a call, giving away more details so more crucial information could be known. Defender however remained secretive.

Parlo was seen confronting Defender on his past actions on July 1st 2025, Defender who is Deleted User was seen being adamant that he was in the right and was innocent for the Ikea situation, claiming however that he does not have much proof backing himself up as it happened long ago. Defender claims that Ikea was a predator and that he was 18. Defender also stated that he never spread explicit content of him, making the statement that ‘if they had access to the content they would have leaked it already’.

It was Defender attempting to create unprovable points and rebuttals that muddied the water of the situation. It was unknown the actual age of Ikea, with cybercriminal UTTP members claiming he was 16, meanwhile Defender claimed he was 18, it was difficult to understand the reality behind the situation.

Both sides had a pattern of manipulation, fabricating evidence, defamation and warping the narrative.

This also proves that Parlo was concerned about the Ikea accusations weeks and even in other cases, months before the full chat logs were released contextualising the situation.

Parlo confronts Defender about the Ikea situation and how his alleged alternate account ‘CliffJumper’ operated a Discord GC where the explicit images were posted in and how this was revealed in a video recording AnimeSucks had posted which has been referenced earlier in this document. Defender however attempts to claim the explicit image which featured in the video showing the GC was not of Ikea and it was from Pornhub.

Parlo brings up how during the times where he posted the cropped screenshot in reference to the situation or order to press him, Defender would respond claiming it was fake. Parlo brought this up as it was clear that Defender was contradicting himself. Defender then immediately retorts claiming it was indeed a fake screenshot and the full discord messages which were presented in FPS’ document contextualising the situation, were fabricated too.

Parlo in private dms with AntiTroll [before he went back to purge all messages on Nov 2025], was seen discussing the situation in depth in regards to Defender and making it clear that Defender had actively utilised a myriad of excuses to try and belittle his own actions in regards to the Ikea situation and his history of getting people to SH.

HairyTwinkle Situation

There have been numerous false claims and insinuations made by online users that Parlo was personally involved in HairyTwinkle being attacked and harassed by Defender and Cara [Defender’s comgirl associate and victim herself]. 

This is a lie. 

Parlo was NOT involved and had no knowledge of the situation at the time. 

HairyTwinkle himself is an absolutely abhorrent individual. There is a document compiling evidence in regards to his behaviour of doxxing, harassment and posting NSFL material to minors in order to traumatise them. HairyTwinkle willingly worked with the UTTP despite knowing they were cybercriminals, he should not be infantilised as he knew the ramifications behind his actions and engage with them nonetheless.

His [Hairy’s] own actions however, do not nullify Defender and Cara’s disgusting actions towards him, despite Cara being a victim herself of Defender’s manipulation and threats, her own actions were completely inexcusable. They eventually confronted HairyTwinkle on call, causing him to have a self destructive mental breakdown in which they callously mocked. This entire ordeal made Parlo feel disgusted upon knowing the full extent of the situation.

Defender had used Cara to sexually message Hairy to get vulnerable messages from him, Cara was 16, Defender was ~16 and Hairy was ~ 14/15. Hairy had also given permission to Defender to manage his channel due to his close trust and affiliation to the UTTP, which led to Defender posting NSFW on the account and getting it terminated.

On 4th July 2025, Parlo had contacted HairyTwinkle in a private Discord GC, and had asked him a few questions to get full clarity on the situation. Video proof of the chat exchange is provided HERE.

HairyTwinkle is seen attesting that he is not being extorted or coerced into answering these questions and that Parlo and Gwamgo were trying to help him regarding everything behind the scenes.

HairyTwinkle states that Parlo had nothing to do with the harassment and emotional manipulation he faced from both Defender and Cara and that Parlo had no involvement with the situation or leaked call where he was having a breakdown in. 

Proof is provided in a Discord recording HERE, that the account which sent the messages in response to Parlo was HairyTwinkle and that the account was AUTHENTIC. HairyTwinkle had made a community post on his other channel showing his legitimate Discord account compared to another which was faked and made to impersonate him.

As established earlier, Parlo makes it clear in the call that he had nothing to do with the harassment that Defender and Cara conducted against HairyTwinkle. Defender does not object or refute this.

In FPS’ document which is co-written by his associates, it is claimed that Parlo was ‘defending’ and ‘covering up’ for Defender by blurring out his name and profile picture, along with Cara. This is a complete lie. 

Their profile pictures and names [except from 1 instance of Defender’s name being left unblurred accidentally in the text above], was to prevent either individual from gaining more attention from the incident when Parlo covered it in a main channel video with hundreds of thousands of views. Both Cara and Defender published the HairyTwinkle breakdown video themselves, hoping to farm attention and notoriety off the situation, and Parlo didn’t want to be blamed for giving them more attention in the process, so he informed Kormanx, his editor, to censor their profile pictures and names. 

3 weeks before Parlo had referenced the HairyTwinkle breakdown situation in his main channel video which was released on 22nd July 2025, Defender was seen pushing Parlo to try and cover how the UTTP backstabbed Hairy, as he wanted to receive attention from the ordeal. Parlo however ignored Defender’s statement, instead asking him for more screenshots against UTTP and Glen [the UTTP commander at the time].

Parlo has also asked Defender for the full message history between Hairy and Cara, however Defender claimed he could not provide them since Cara was offline. 

Parlo never ended up receiving the chat messages and didn’t realise how disgusting the situation was until weeks later.

When it was clear that Defender wasn’t entirely cooperating with proving information to do with what actually happened, and had lied claiming Cara posted NSFW on Hairy’s channel when it was in fact his own doing, Parlo started to look over the entire situation on KiwiFarms and did his own research, eventually due to this he came to terms with the fact that Defender was a malicious bad actor and how his actions were inexcusable.

On July 7th, Parlo was seen privately messaging Gwamgo and stressing to him that what Defender had just done to HairyTwinkle was absolutely terrible and disgusting, and he was wondering how to address the situation. Parlo covers how he didn’t know the extent of Defender’s actions until more people started to unearth what had actually happened to Hairy as well as FPS releasing his document. 

Parlo also clarified that he would be making a video disavowing what happened even though it hasn’t received a lot of attention at the time, since it is his moral obligation to call such a vile situation out. These messages prove that Parlo was not trying to conceal what happened, in reality he did not know the extent of the situation and was ignorant to have trusted Defender.

Parlo confronts Defender on how he used Cara to go after HairyTwinkle and that Defender posted NSFW on Hairy’s YouTube Channel to get it terminated. 

Defender denies using Cara but admits to posting NSFW to terminate Hairy, this is despite the fact he lied weeks prior claiming Cara did this.

Parlo was seen being shocked at the fact that Hairy’s channel had NSFW posted on it, later coming to realise his account was hijacked.

As presented, Parlo had made it clear to HairyTwinkle that he believes that he was a victim of Defender’s actions and that he was disgusted by what he had seen. Parlo made it clear beyond this point with other users that he had effectively severed all ties with Defender beyond this point, only contacting him to get more information to exonerate himself from false claims due to Defender’s own actions.

When information started to be released of HairyTwinkle’s channel being terminated and that he was doxxed, Parlo was initially justifiably skeptical as Hairy was known to be a habitual liar and had attacked and slandered many people including Parlo for numerous weeks. When proof was shown minutes later however, he started to realise the gravity of the situation.

Parlo was shown a few excerpts between Cara and HairyTwinkle and he was seen stating in reply his disgust towards the situation, not knowing at the time that this was targeted emotional manipulation that Defender conducted to attack Hairy and that was part of his greater plan against him.

Parlo was seen stating on the 11th July directly to Defender how disgusting his and Cara’s actions were towards him.

Cara adamantly states that Defender was 16 years old.

Cara

Cara was a 16 year old UTTP com-girl who was closely associated with Defender. She was utilised as a proxy / decoy by Defender to get HairyTwinkle in a vulnerable position so that he would be sexual with her, to which then she would then leak the DMs to humiliate him. Cara was openly hypersexual and had engaged online sexually with HairyTwinkle for a brief period of time, while he was 14. It was a less than 2 year age gap, however it included elements of financial coercion and emotional manipulation.

Defender [Deleted User] was seen stating that Cara was 16.

Cara was seen stating that she was 16, along with showing messages she had with Hairy, where he would send her money, to which she would coerce him for more.

At the time, Cara presented the situation as if she was being pressured and coerced by HairyTwinkle, who keep in mind at this time had NUMEROUS VICTIMS as made clear in this document.

Cara stated how Hairy was harassing her for explicit images and pressuring her to engage with him in calls, while also showing a screenshot of Hairy admitting to possessing content of her nude, to use it as blackmail against her.

At the time it seemed as if Hairy was the one who was instigating many of the topics of conversation and Parlo had believed the age gaps present; Cara being 16 and Hairy being 14 turning 15 [less than 2 year age gap], was not indicative of grooming at the time.

This was until more evidence was provided on KiwiFarms breaking down the severity of the situation,  as well as Parlo looking more into the situation himself rather than relying on testimony from both Cara and Defender about what took place. As proven in this document, Parlo had eventually come to terms with what Cara and Defender had actually done and was absolutely disgusted about what had happened.

Parlo had also believed that there was another dynamic behind this situation, sure what Defender and Cara did was inexcusable, but he was also concerned about Defender’s affiliation with Cara. This suspicion was affirmed with the release of FPS’ document that showed Defender was using Cara for his own malicious intentions, even allegedly pushing her to SH and also drawing with marker, his initials on parts of her body. THIS WILL NOT BE SHOWN FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.

Cara was seen stating that she was carving Defender into her skin. It is unknown the full context behind this chat exchange on whether Defender coerced her to do this, or she chose to on her own volition.

Cara herself had also worked with other UTTP associates such as Miami, to forge fake predator DMs against Parlo in May 2025, along with making numerous comments sexually harassing him and his mutuals while also posting NSFW artwork of his character, one specific image being made in 2022 when he was still 17.

As presented are just a few examples of Cara’s sexual harassment targeting Parlo. 

To which he did NOT reciprocate and ignored. 

This is however given as background context to show that Cara would deliberately engage in attention grabbing degenerative behaviour. These examples were sporadically posted by Cara while Parlo was present in GC’s with Defender awaiting information from him.

On July 11th 2025, Parlo reached out to Cara without Defender’s knowledge to get their side of the situation. Parlo however made it clear that what she did to HairyTwinkle disgusted him and was inexcusable. These messages were originally going to be kept private, however to give crucial context behind the situation, they have been made public. This proves that Parlo had no foreknowledge about what they were doing to Hairy.

Parlo highlights that there are large consequences that both she and Defender should face for what they did, while also highlighting that he himself had nothing to do with the situation. 

Cara then had sent numerous voice notes opening up about how she was manipulated and pressured to do what she did to Hairy on the direct orders of Defender.

Parlo responds by acknowledging that despite what she did being inexcusable, she was objectively a victim of Defender’s depraved actions herself and he had asked her to stay in contact with him, so she could help provide more information in the future.

Parlo also highlighted as mentioned earlier, that he had to keep Defender close simply due to his threats to blackmail and doxxing if Parlo were just to promptly cut him off and sever all contact.

Cara was then seen stating that she was afraid of Defender doxxing and harassing her, to which Parlo recommends her to remain on the low for the next couple of days, to avoid possible repercussions for coming out about Defender. HairyTwinkle had also contacted Cara about the situation with Parlo explaining that this was due to him and others looking into his situation and how he was effectively backstabbed and manipulated by the UTTP. [This does not exonerate him for his illegal actions]. Cara had also provided Parlo with information about Defender’s name and age.

Proof is shown from an archived screenshot at the time [LEFT] and the discord messages as of recently [RIGHT], proving that Deleted User was Cara [^_<].

Parlo once again affirms he had nothing to do with the harassment that befell HairyTwinkle, with Cara also stating that she believed she was groomed by Defender into doing things for him.

Cara states that Defender manipulated her and oftentimes acted like he was her friend, however was allegedly using her for money numerous times.

Parlo had also stated that Defender allegedly leaked CSAM of her. This is partially corroborated by an existing screenshot where Defender posts a sexualised image of her with the initials DF written in marker on her skin. This image is accompanied by the text ‘How is this flat’.

On 20th July 2025, Cara had asked Parlo if there were any new updates in regards to Defender, to which Parlo states that he has been airing and ignoring him since he doesn't know how to go about dealing with the situation. He also highlights how HairyTwinkle has effectively gone offline.

Parlo had also highlighted that he believed Defender was around his age at the time and that he had purposefully avoided making his age known, alluding to himself being around 18 at the time.

Parlo confirms that he did not know Defender’s actual age and was never informed by him or anyone else that he was a minor.

In FPS’ document, he was seen adamantly stating that Defender was known to be most likely an adult and 18 years of age. He however states that if that wasn’t true and Parlo knew Defender’s true age, that would be ‘revealing’ as he was purposefully ambiguous with it towards everyone, corroborating the fact that Defender was not transparent with his age at all. FPS tries to make it look like Defender was so close to Parlo, that he was open about his personal information. This is a lie, Parlo only knew Defender’s age when Cara told him in July 2025 and Defender’s school friends attested.

The Entire Potemer Situation

This section will tackle the entire Potemer situation in general as it is also closely linked to the actions of Defender himself.

Another extremely large claim derived from Parlo’s association with Defender was that is contributed to Potemer getting away with it, as once private information was found about him, doxxing, harassment and swatting soon followed which allowed Potemer and his family to play victim to Police in the process with the weight of the case diminishing over time. This is untrue.

Many people attribute the swatting that took place against Potemer as being directly Parlo’s fault with claims that he facilitated the behaviour and that he conceptualised or was associated in a discord server called PotemerFall, where the swatting and doxxing of Potemer was encouraged. This is a LIE and will be discussed in depth.

Parlo and Gwamgo had both believed that the police investigation into Potemer was severely affected by the harassment that took place due to the UTTP, this can be seen in Gwamgo's admission statement in his video 'The Sad Life of Parlo', or his message to Schlep about the NCMEC report. However these turned out to be unsubstantiated claims which originally stemmed from a known liar and UTTP member called Striker who had forwarded them this information, shortly after he swatted Potemer and claimed that the police came to visit him.

Parlo [and by extension Gwamgo], have also been pitted with the direct responsibility of Potemer getting away with his actions due to him not filing a police report before releasing his video on January 2025. This is a redundant argument however as countless influential members of the community were made aware of Potemer's actions such as MDF and Ruben Sim [there are more]. 

One of the earliest examples of people openly discussing the Potemer situation was 19th July 2024. Parlo has originally released his video calling out Potemer in Mid-January 2025. The information was public knowledge 6 months before Parlo actively started looking into the claims in Late December 2024.

DukDolan has also provided information that a once high ranking member of MFD; AlaskanReality, had also made a video covering the Potemer situation in Late July 2024.

TravyTrav who was a high ranking mod of MFD was also seen discussing the Potemer situation with DukDolan on July 26th 2024 in the MDF Discord server.

Ruben was also seen being informed of the Potemer situation in late July and advocating for Potemer's ban, regardless of if he was a minor at the time, as he saw that the age gap was horrible.

In the lead-up to Parlo's video calling out Potemer, Trav had consulted him days prior stating that the girl involved [Queen] had told him that a police officer told her that there is 'no need to make a case' out of what transpired. Trav also explained that the parents did not wish to make a case either, making the argument to Parlo on why he should 'bring this up again' as it should in his mind, remain private.

This is pivotal to highlight because according to Trav, both the police and the parents did NOT wish to make a case or initiate legal action from what transpired. This already significantly hinders any argument that Parlo not making a police report led to Potemer getting anyway.

Numerous creators knew what Potemer did beforehand yet they did not make a report and unless the victim herself was willing to create the report and testify to what took place, it was virtually impossible for any legal action to be derived. 

Both the mothers played a huge part in why Potemer got away with it, as they both helped to cover up the situation and forced their own children to lie about what took place to avoid any negative implications for themselves.

Without substantial evidence, the victim [Queen's] mother could easily force her daughter to deny what took place and the police would have no feasible proof or victim testimony to prosecute Potemer.

Queen's Mother had also allegedly allowed her daughter to engage in another predatory online relationship with an 18 year old while she was 13 in 2024, this was covered in Gwamgo's video. 

For more clarification too, Parlo has received threatening and misleading statements from TravyTrav in late December 2024 while he was digging for evidence into the Potemer situation.

TravyTrav was seen in a group chat that contained Parlo, Schlep and other notable content creators, actively lying about the age gap between both Potemer and Queen, claiming it to have been 14 and 16. This is despite Potemer on numerous occasions in months prior, admitting to it being 16 and 12.

TravyTrav was then seen arguing that the victim Queen 'did consent' despite her being under the age of consent and that they simply 'fooled around'.

Most importantly to cover however, was Trav threatening to make Parlo's life a 'living hell' if he goes through with making a video on the Potemer situation. Trav also stated in a previous message that if Parlo publicises what Potemer did, he would be 'on him'.

The Group Chat where this took place in was called; 'To Catch a Robloxian'. This was due to a popular series Schlep created where he would catch Roblox Predators and confront them on stage in front of an audience in game. This proves that the conversations to do with Potemer and his allegations were actively discussed in that group chat containing other Roblox YouTubers weeks before the information was publicised by Parlo in late January 2025.

To also make this clear, no identifiable information was obtained at the time for Parlo to have even filed a direct police report regardless to his local station.

NCMEC / FBI reports themselves are proven to be unreliable. There is often no active communication with law enforcement when the report is filed, no email confirmation that it has been sent or the information is being reviewed and often times they are completely ignored with no action taken.

Gwamgo did file a NCMEC report against Potemer and said this to Schlep, however this was not made clear to Parlo or the public until the release of his video; Roblox YouTuber Potemer is Worse Than You Think. Released on October 23rd 2026.

Gwamgo used the term NCMEC and police report interchangeably, what he sent was a NCMEC report, not an actual police report. Also at this time Gwamgo had believed the UTTP exclusively hindered any efforts of Potemer actually being prosecuted or charged.

Since there is often a habit of scape-goating responsibility onto already controversial YouTubers to redirect attention, it is wholly illogical to pin the blame on Parlo for not making a police report due to the factors that have now been discussed. 

More to do with this will also be covered.

Parlo on his Mow account [which has been suspended] had stated directly to Defender in 2025 that he had nothing to do with PotemerFall, to which Defender stated once again that he never stated he was in the first place. Defender is seen corroborating the fact that Parlo had nothing to do with the creation or facilitation of the PotemerFall discord server. Parlo and Gwamgo explicitly spoke in private about how problematic the server was, and despite Defender attempting to manipulate both of them to promote the server, like what he did with another Roblox commentary YouTuber; Inceptus, neither engaged nor complied. Parlo had shown Gwamgo private DMs of him ignoring Defender when it came to PotemerFall.

Parlo was seen stating on his deleted Discord account to Gwamgo, if he had any recordings of screenshots of when they confronted Defender about PotemerFall, proving that it did take place, however evidence of it is most likely irretrievable.

In March 2025, Gwamgo was seen confronting Defender about his actions in PotemerFall and stated he does not condone nor support what Defender did whatsoever. 

Gwamgo also states that he heard the police were on Potemer's side due to the harassment the UTTP were perpetuating such as apparent false reports to his school.

Gwamgo also makes it clear Defenders actions are having an adverse affect to himself and also Parlo who had nothing to do with what was taking place.

Defender denies the claims in response. This proves that both Parlo and Gwamgo had nothing to do with what took place in PotemerFall and the extended harassment that Potemer faced. It also shows that Gwamgo at the time believed that the UTTP harassment led to Potemer getting away with it, despite this being proven later on to have not been true.

Parlo made it clear to Defender in a leaked recording that he had nothing to do with PotemerFall, to which Defender affirms that he was not complicit and never said he was. Defender would then go on to state that the Roblox commentary YouTube Inceptus willingly wanted to promote the server on his own volition.

In leaked DMs between Inceptus and Defender, he was seen attempting to manipulate Inceptus into promoting his PotemerFall discord server to his audience, which Inceptus complied with. Defender attempted to interject himself into the Potemer situation to make the situation about him and how he could personally benefit off the entire ordeal.

Defender also had a tendency to lie about Parlo’s intentions publicly, as he would admit to doing this numerous times in 2025, lying directly to users such as 77. Defender claims that Parlo got him into hating Potemer, people have misconstrued this into being that Parlo encouraged the swatting and harassment of Potemer in real life, which was not true.

Inceptus however was on board with the idea of swatting Potemer.

Defender had made it clear on SkibidiFarms that he already disliked Potemer for a personal situation that took place in September 2024, months before his allegations were more widespread and known.

Due to the severity of the crimes that Potemer admitted to numerous times, Parlo supported the idea of making a police report against him so that he could face legal action rather than just reputational damage. In order to do so, Parlo believed that they first needed to verify Potemer’s personal information, so he privately worked with Defender and other YouTubers to gather this. Numerous of Potemer’s friends from school also helped corroborate the information. 

Parlo did not feel responsible enough for him to make a police report himself, he wished to aid in the information collecting privately, however he saw himself as young, inexperienced and mainly someone more suitable to making callout videos. 

Parlo never engaged in the swatting or in real life harassment of Potemer, he was skeptical about the alleged house address even belonging to him, and was extremely concerned that it could be someone completely different living there. Furthermore Parlo was concerned of the harassment that could befall to Potemer’s other family members who were innocent.

Parlo has already admitted publicly on stream and in private that it was completely illogical to have worked with Defender to do this, while he claims he did this because Defender has good knowledge of OPSEC, he stresses that he should have known that when this information was obtained, Defender would have most likely spread it to his associates who would have instigated a long harassment campaign.

Defender does not refute this and instead changes the topic.

As shown in archived discord messages, Parlo had received much of Potemer’s information from his classmates and past friends. The information was not gathered unethically or illegally. They provided it on their own volition.

As Kate made clear in Parlo’s discord server, the act of them privately gathering the information so that Potemer can be reported to the authorities was not illegal nor was it doxxing. The private information was not published on the direct request of Parlo, to other users with the intent to harass Potemer.

It was made clear with Parlo’s mutuals in early March 2025 that Potemer’s information was solely collected to file reports to his local police against him.

Parlo was seen confronting Defender in late December 2025, after months of disengaging from him, to try and get him to admit to more points. Parlo was seen stating that people were lying claiming that he supported Defender wanting to get Potemer killed in a swatting, Defender denies this claim. Parlo also states that other online individuals have attempted to claim that he urged Defender to swat Potemer and that he was ‘directly responsible’ for calls on Potemer’s house, to which Defender once again denies and claims it is easy to prove Parlo had nothing to do with it.

Parlo in late December 2025 was seen angrily messaging Defender about the way everyone has been attacking / harassing him and piling on overexaggerated claims against him while he has no platform to defend himself on. 

He also makes it clear that he wants to defend himself from any claims that he was involved in the immoral acts and plans that Defender was conducting on his own volition, to which Defender understands.

Defender was then seen attempting to feign the idea that he was also treated horribly by people who were close to him and that the screenshots used against him by FPS, were actually fabricated by him, Parlo offered no response because he knew this to be a weak attempt at victimisation and manipulation. 

The private collection of Potemer’s information was done by numerous individuals, Defender was not the main person. 

However when Potemer was believed to be identified, Parlo had consulted with Schlep, who heavily urged him on call to not go through with making a police report or engaging with Potemer.

Schlep warned that making a police report now after the consistent UTTP harassment, could potentially be used by Potemer’s family and his lawyers to manipulate the narrative and 'prove' that extensive harassment stemmed directly from Parlo and Gwamgo when they inevitably try to seek legal recourse. 

Schlep has also highlighted to Gwamgo that the police would not seek to prosecute what took place as Potemer was still a minor at the time and both of the parents were willing to conceal the extent of the situation.

To make this clear, Schlep is not defending Potemer. Schlep is, however, making it clear that the police in Texas would not charge Potemer with any crime as he was 16 years of age at the time.

Schlep later continued to warn Parlo about making more statements about Potemer. Objectively he was right about his concerns and warnings.

This is one of the reasons for why Parlo and his associates stepped back from making any police reports against Potemer once the information was collected since this corroborated with what Trav stated earlier, with the police not directing resources or large amounts of interest on prosecuting 'close age gaps' involving COCSA [child on child sexual assault]. 

This was also compounded by the belief that the UTTP had squandered any attempt to charge Potemer [which was untrue]. Unfortunately however, Defender had gone rogue and started encouraging his associates in PotemerFall to swat him with the information that he partially helped to collect, attempting to interject himself in the situation for attention and to claim credit for everything.

Additionally it was impossible at that point to prevent Defender from doing this, he obviously knew what he was doing could have put people in harm's way and that is why he used mules such as Striker to make calls to the police, along with other individuals who were recorded. Defender did this because he did not want to face any legal ramifications by doing this directly himself, if he got his associates to do his dirty work, he believed he could get away with it. Defender then attempted to take credit by claiming he also did it.

There was virtually nothing that could have been done or said to have stopped Defender or his associates from continuing to spread the information, they may have well believed they were in their ‘moral right’ to do this as Potemer was a repulsive person, however it could have also been them wanting a valid justification and excuse just to harass someone without many people objecting.

Parlo was seen explaining how Defender operated with him using Striker as a proxy. Parlo also stated that Striker had swatted his family’s house in 2024 and had swatted Potemer.

Striker was seen urging other UTTP members to file false police reports against Parlo and providing his address. Striker had also contacted Parlo's University to try and file false threats against them.

In AntiTroll’s leaked recording, Gwamgo was seen confronting Defender on how illogical it was for him to have made an offhand comment that he wanted to swat Potemer. This is before the creation of PotemerFall.

Weeks later in early 2025 as mentioned earlier, both Parlo and Gwamgo in private were consulted by Striker and Defender in which Striker admitted to swatting Potemer. Striker then claimed that police then visited him about the swatting attempt and were using the incident to then victimise Potemer in the process.

Parlo and Gwamgo were furious about this and wanted nothing to do with Defender’s antics with PotemerFall and they dissociated themselves completely from him at the time.

Keep in mind, what Striker had said was unsubstantiated and lacked evidence. However Parlo, Gwamgo and Defender believed this to have been true at the time.

In response to Pete151’s video claiming that Parlo ‘helped’ Defender swat Potemer and that it led to Potemer getting away with it, Potemer’s own mother claimed this to be a complete lie in a YouTube comment on her alternate account called ‘herewegoagain’. Her previous account was called Shamrock in which she doxxed Parlo’s name.

Potemer’s mother states that the police were involved within the first days of Parlo’s first original video in late January. She states that it started with the school resource officer and was escalated to the police department via the cyber-crimes division.

Potemer’s mother even states none of the doxxing had started at this time and that the police were already investigating long before it. She verbatim states that ‘the whole claim that it wasn’t taken seriously because of the doxxing and swatting is absolute BS because it hadn’t even happened yet’. 

This is mutually exclusive to the NCMEC report Gwamgo had made, as that report never went anywhere.

Link to the comment thread Potemer's mother made - Gwamgo's SKELETONS are OUT OF THE CLOSET pt. 2

Link to the comment thread Potemer's mother made - GWAMGO LIED, KORMANX CRIED, PARLO...

Link to Potemer's mothers channel; Herewegoagain - YouTube

YouTuber's such as Zombiey were skeptical on whether this account was actually operated by Potemer's mother, however as proven in this comment thread, this user called 'herewegoagain', claimed to be a 'close friend to Potemer', while making the exact same talking points Potemer's own mother made in call to defend and nullify the actions of her son. This commentor knew information only someone close to Potemer would know and it is evident via the typing style that this is clearly not a peer of Potemer, but rather most likely an adult who is referring to their own child as a 'talented kid'.

It is incredibly easy to discern that this is Potemer's mother by the pattern of speech.

The full comment thread has been provided to allow users to gather their own thoughts.

Xero, along with SeshSpawn two of Parlo’s A-loggers in 2025, were seen making the definitive and false claim that Parlo and Gwamgo had aided Defender with swatting Potemer, and that it led to Potemer getting away with it.

With this situation it is hard to disprove a negative, many people have utilised circumstantial evidence to make it appear as if Parlo had ordered, instructed or facilitated an environment to swat Potemer, these are all untrue. The people who engaged in the behaviour were old enough to have the full agency behind their actions to know what they were doing was immoral and wrong and they did it on their own volition, there were no external factors that influenced them.

Parlo had warned Striker that he wanted nothing to do with his online criminal activities or harassment towards Potemer, to which Striker was afraid of facing legal ramifications as he had also swatted Parlo the year before and harassed him with CSAM material. Striker essentially admits he was the one who swatted Potemer.

Defender was seen acknowledging that Striker did swat Potemer, however he didn't manage to get an admission statement yet.

Parlo was seen stating to AntiTroll in a group chat with him and Gwamgo, that Defender would lie about his age and remained purposefully ambiguous with it. He also brought up how Defender had called both him and Gwamgo and admitted to getting Striker to swat what they believed to be Potemer’s house. Parlo also confirms on his old deleted account, he had shown DMs of Defender consistently pressing him to join PotemerFall, to which he would purposefully ignore and refuse to engage with as in his own words he wanted 0 involvement with it.

SH situation

In late 2023 / early 2024, Parlo had called out Defender in a YouTube video for allegedly getting unknown individuals to SH.

Parlo had called this behaviour out in his video as it was extremely concerning and he had directly confronted Defender about the situation.

Defender both in leaked calls provided and in private, was adamant that the people involved were all adults and that they were predators.

As previously specified;

-insert-

26:26 - Parlo confronts Defender over the SH situation, where Defender got unknown individuals to s*lf h*arm. Defender affirms that he went a ‘little too far’ with that. Parlo states how Defender would manipulate the narrative when it was brought up in the past [2023/24] stating the people were predators, Defender replies affirming this and that they were adults with ‘the youngest being 19’. [26:53]

There is no way to disprove this claim however keep in mind that Defender has a history of lying and manipulation as presented in this document, so take his claim with a pinch of salt.

27:40 - Parlo states that he wouldn’t classify Defender as a predator for his actions, as the SH situation took place when he was 14/15 and the Ikea situation took place when he was around 15. However Parlo expressed his disgust in Defender’s alleged actions especially in regards to Ikea as it was still highly immoral and illegal, IF the claim was true. Defender responds by stating; ‘It’s not true at all and we know it’s not true’. 

Unfortunately, there was no counter evidence presented at the time to refute Defender’s points. However it was made clear over time that Defender hinges his defense on unprovable factors to try and muddy the waters of the situation.

An additional claim also made was that Defender had apparently admitted to nearly pushing someone into suicide. 

These were private messages between Defender and an unknown individual. 

These messages were not made public until FPS’ document was released on July 7th 2025, when Parlo had come across this evidence he was disgusted and immediately contacted Defender on the legitimacy of this allegation. These messages were sent on 14th January 2024, it took 18 months before they were released.

Defender [on a Deleted account] was seen denying this happening and questioning the legitimacy of it, stating that if it was true he would have ‘bragged about it’, which is an especially unhinged response to make claims that are this serious. 

Since Defender was known to be 16 in July 2025, this most likely meant he was around 14 during the time of him getting people to self harm in late 2023 / early 2024. 

None of the people who Defender allegedly coerced into self-harming publicly came out, so their identities remain completely unknown. There was no evidence provided to conclude the ages of the individuals, with Defender being the only person involved stating ‘everyone was an adult’ and that they were ‘predators’, which as we can conclude may be more examples of his manipulative lies.

The example of Defender bragging about getting someone to almost commit suicide may have been an example of an extremely edgy teen lying because they wanted to try to fit into degenerate circles on the internet to feel ‘included’, rather than a genuine admission. 

This is not stated to excuse Defender, but he has a large pattern of overplaying his actions and character and teenagers online oftentimes have a tendency to lie.

It is unfortunate that the truth behind these 2 situations will never be laid bare since there is a succinct lack of evidence to prove the ages of the individuals involved, or whether Defender’s callous braggadocious comment was based in any reality.

Before FPS’ document was made public on July 7th 2025, Parlo [on a Deleted account] was seen stating on 14th June that to his knowledge Defender never coerced kids into harming themselves. If Defender was lying about the ages of the individuals involved, this proves that he was actively manipulating Parlo in private to try and cover for his own actions.

Parlo was seen saying this in a group chat called ‘Chaos Emeralds’ directly to MUGEN who he was very close to at the time.

Parlo was also seen attesting that he never paid Defender to dox anyone.

Defender's Doxxing

Defender had a large history of doxxing individuals that he had a personal vendetta with, in numerous circumstances he had personally doxxed Parlo and also behind his back, organised harassment raids to target him where he attempted to collaborate directly with users such as Nathorix.

Defender had openly doxxed and released personal information in regards to Parlo such as his address, images of his house, his parents legal names and his face. Parlo filed a privacy strike and YouTube took action against him in February 2024.

Parlo has never been complicit in Defender’s harassment of users and in numerous examples, Defender has gone on out of his own volition to engage in abrasive actions. Defender has a long pattern of overexaggeration, twisting the narrative and manipulating users to do what he wants. There is absolutely no evidence of Parlo being complicit in doxxing Nathorix because it is untrue. Defender had also only decided to target Potemer due to personal reasons such as a past petty discord dispute, rather than due to the serious allegations spearheaded by Parlo.

Parlo had never organised or was involved in an environment/space where personal information was obtained from any other user via Defender.

Parlo was seen practicing restraint privately and ensuring that Defender never attempted to go out on his own volition and dox / harass anyone specifically 77. 

In limited cases when Parlo would complain about a certain user, Defender has secretly gone out to harass them as he believes he has been given some moral excuse to justify his irate behaviour. In one specific case, Parlo became aware of Defender’s actions, was extremely angry and directly confronted him.

While it is difficult to prove a negative since there is an absence of any evidence to the contrary, messages have been provided of Parlo stating that he never told Defender to target, dox, extort or swat Dupe to which Defender agrees. [The context was in reference to AntiTroll having leaked videos and Parlo was wondering if Dupe was mentioned and what was said as this was the peak of the Dupe situation in early 2025.]

Parlo had also directly confronted Defender for his actions in late January 2025 for going after a random YouTuber who was critical of Parlo, thereby making him look worse in the process. Parlo did not instruct Defender to engage in any of this behaviour whatsoever and did not support it.

A leaked recording was also provided which was originally recorded by Avenger, an associate of Saythe who was known for doxxing and accessing child pornography.

This recording was subsequently utilised to push the idea that Parlo was complicit in the RATTING of Puss. To provide context, Parlo was present in a VC with Defender and other users, when Defender flaunted the idea of getting Puss to scan a QR code which would allow him to access his email. 

Parlo was playing Roblox in the background and evidently did not care about what was being discussed, he made constant sarcastic comments, many to slant Defender and to belittle him and Parlo even highlighted how flawed the idea was, and did not take it seriously. To make this clear too, Defender had pre-existing drama with Puss and did not like him even before the Potemer situation transpired.

The entire QR code plan that Defender was attempting to conduct never amounted to anything and Parlo already casted doubt on Defender's delusional plan stating that Puss who was an adult, was obviously not going to fall for this plan. To make this abundantly clear, Parlo had no expertise in RATTING nor understood how it worked.

Puss was 18 in 2025.

While Defender became increasingly more desperate for a way to convince Puss to scan a QR code he obviously was not going to fall for, Parlo decided to troll Defender at his expense, making obvious joke ploys as he was not taking the situation seriously whatsoever. Defender was heard getting slightly agitated.

Parlo once again was then heard voicing how dumb he perceived that this idea was, showing that he obviously did not support it and then asked Defender how this operation [and the concept of RATTING] would even work.

Parlo then again jokingly wastes Defender's time by proposing another obviously garbage plan to ragebait him to which Defender responds by telling him to 'shut up'.

When Defender tries to reiterate his plan and it is obvious that he has no idea what he is doing, Parlo sarcastically mocks him stating; 'you're really getting there, you're really cooking'. Defender who is unamused replies that 'he is [getting there]'. Parlo then is heard mocking his voice before he is interrupted.

All of this information clearly shows that Parlo did not care about this situation and was barely contributing to the conversation, other than making jokes at Defender's expense.

Parlo again is heard mocking the plan, sarcastically stating that it would be 'fool proof'.

Parlo then again mentions how flawed Defender's idea is and how he overestimates how dumb he perceives Puss to be. Obviously showing once more, that Parlo was never onboard with this idea like some people have attempted to construed. 

Once Defender attempts to try to come up with a new plan of action, Parlo again takes a jab at him and says; 'ooooh yeah... about that...', trying to ragebait him / cast doubt on the plan and proving that rather than being 'complicit', he was rather just present and deliberately being annoying to try and hinder any actual logical conversation.

As the call progressed it became increasingly silent and uneventful. Parlo was not engaging nor speaking other than 2 final statements he makes in reference to an 'Escape Jeff the Killer in Area 51' Roblox game he was playing in the background, which annoyed Defender, since rather than engaging in any 'meaningful' discussion, Parlo was simply wasting time and ragebaiting.

Parlo was not 'complicit' in the RATTING, since he actively knew this situation would go nowhere due to Defender's gross incompetence and how illogical the entire plan was anyway. Parlo was a critical observer present in a call while he was playing Roblox in the background. His association with Defender can be criticised, but he never once actually provided information, aided or contributed to the RATTING of Puss or anyone else. 

The Israel / Palestine Video

In 2023 shortly after what transpired on October 7th, Parlo made a very tone deaf video covering the Israel Palestine conflict. This video was initially monetized.

Since this video was created, it has often been republished consistently on Twitter, with people making the accusation that Parlo was either Pro-Zionist or Anti-Muslim. This is completely untrue.

I am completely diametrically opposed to what Israel has committed and in the video before I educated myself more on the situation I took a more neutral stance.

People have also claimed that the video was urging Roblox to intervene in the conflict and stop it. This is not true either. The video discussed a controversial Roblox Twitter member who was mocking the deaths of civilians at the time as well as numerous Roblox games on the platform that were mimicking the conflict which should have been taken down, hence why Parlo stated ‘STOP THIS ROBLOX’.

Parlo - ‘I understand how people could have completely misunderstood the purpose of the video, they would come to terms with the contents of what was discussed had they watched it, but it was littered with attention grabbing Minecraft sound effects and the video should never have been made in the first place. I shouldn’t have gone the extra mile to monetize it either, and I have apologised for this situation.’

On YouTube studio before the monetization was turned off, the video had garnered £86.20 [$109.82].

On November 10th, Parlo donated two payments to charity [St Jude’s Hospital]. He paid $50 and then $55, so collectively $105.

Parlo then sent an additional donation of $32-40 to UNICEF to help children affected by the escalation of violence in Gaza.

Parlo - ‘Once again I am sorry for ever engaging in this degenerate topic jumping clickbait content that I often did between 2023 -2025. I have grown out of this phase and look back at all my collective past actions in disdain. I just want to clarify that I did not make the thumbnail, it was one of my editors who created it via AI. I did have an interest in Geopolitics and wanted to also express this through content creation and making the video have as high watch-time as possible through extremely poor editing and use of sound effects. While I do believe most people didn’t actually watch the video, so therefore don’t understand the context for why I made it, I still don’t disagree with the fact that it shouldn’t have been made in the first place’.

The Doxxing Situation

SoulDrivenLove

Potemer Victim